Skip to main content

Security report for ifihazdebrecen.hu

Debreceni Ifjúsági Szolgáltató Nonprofit Kft · Non-profit · Hungary

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ifjúsági Ház Debrecen is a small non-profit community center established in 2011 in Debrecen, Hungary, focused on providing cultural, leisure, and youth-oriented programs and services. The website serves as an information portal for events, room rentals, and community activities targeting children, youth, and young families. The business model revolves around community engagement and event hosting, supported by local partnerships. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a moderate tech stack including jQuery and several plugins for galleries and news tickers. The site is mobile-optimized and uses HTTPS, but lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is adequate but could be improved with formal policies and enhanced headers. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and content-rich for its target audience, with clear contact information and consistent branding. The domain age and WHOIS data align well with the business history, supporting legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ifihazdebrecen.hu

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector, focusing on youth and community services in Debrecen. It leverages partnerships with local entities as indicated by partner logos. The business model is service-oriented, providing event spaces, cultural programs, and youth counseling. The website content and structure suggest a stable local presence with a focus on community engagement rather than commercial revenue. No direct monetization or e-commerce features are present. The target customer segment is local youth and families. Growth indicators include active event postings and community involvement. The partnership ecosystem includes local government and youth organizations. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance digital presence with social media integration and improved privacy compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, which limits transparency and readiness. The site uses up-to-date WordPress core and plugins, reducing risk from known vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit community site but should be enhanced to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and mechanism to comply with GDPR and ePrivacy Directive requirements.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit and update all WordPress plugins and core to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Integrate social media links and enhance SEO and accessibility features to improve digital presence and user engagement.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Debreceni Ifjúsági Szolgáltató Nonprofit Kft
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Debreceni Ifjúsági Szolgáltató Nonprofit Kft
Description
Ifjúsági Ház Debrecen is a community center opened in 2011 in Debrecen city center, offering cultural and leisure programs primarily for children, youth, and young families. It supports youth initiatives, talent development, and provides spaces for social and cultural activities.
Key services
cultural programs, leisure activities, event hosting, room rental, youth counseling, free wifi, sports and games facilities, concert and exhibition spaces
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.8.12, jQuery 3.6.0, Animate.css, Google Fonts, Google Maps API, Ditty News Ticker plugin, The Post Grid plugin, FB Photo Sync plugin, TZ Plus Gallery plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Ditty News Ticker
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a community youth center site with cultural and leisure services.
  2. Content is in Hungarian language.
  3. No forms detected on the homepage or main HTML content.
  4. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided in the footer.
  6. No cookie consent banner or mechanism detected.
  7. No security or incident response policies published.
  8. Website uses HTTPS and modern WordPress plugins.
  9. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond basic plugins.
  10. No explicit or adult content present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.8.12 with a modern but moderate technology stack including jQuery 3.6.0, Animate.css, and Google Fonts. It uses several plugins for galleries, news tickers, and event grids. The site loads resources from trusted CDNs and Google APIs. Performance is moderate with lazy loading images and asynchronous script loading. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and viewport meta tags. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA attributes and semantic HTML but could be improved. SEO is basic with meta tags and RSS feeds but lacks structured data like JSON-LD for organization or events. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ifihazdebrecen.hu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ifihazdebrecen.hu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.