Skip to main content

Security report for idpk.cz

POVED - Plzeňský organizátor veřejné dopravy · Transportation · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.idpk.cz serves as the official portal for POVED - Plzeňský organizátor veřejné dopravy, the integrated public transportation organizer for the Plzeň region in the Czech Republic. It provides comprehensive information on public transport schedules, fare calculations, service updates, and related news. The site targets residents and visitors of the region seeking reliable transit information. The business operates as a regional transportation authority with a medium-sized footprint and a focus on public service. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including HTTPS, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site is well-structured with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate with no significant technical debt detected. The use of reCAPTCHA indicates attention to bot mitigation. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses a Content-Security-Policy header to upgrade insecure requests. Cookie consent is actively managed, and tracking scripts are loaded with user consent. However, additional security headers such as HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy could enhance security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Overall, the website demonstrates a solid security and privacy posture appropriate for a public transportation service. The lack of WHOIS data is likely due to privacy protection and does not detract from the site's legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and improving accessibility compliance to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching idpk.cz

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
80
Email security
43
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a regional public transportation organizer in the Czech Republic, focusing on integrated transport services in the Plzeňský kraj. Its competitive advantage lies in providing centralized, accessible transit information and digital tools such as fare calculators and a virtual card mobile app. Revenue streams are likely public funding and service contracts rather than direct sales. The target customers are daily commuters, tourists, and residents relying on public transport. The company maintains partnerships with regional transport providers and integrates third-party services like Google and Facebook for analytics and marketing. Growth indicators include continuous updates to schedules and digital services. The partnership ecosystem includes local transport operators and technology providers for analytics and consent management.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent management, and bot protection via reCAPTCHA. The presence of Content-Security-Policy header is a positive security control. However, the absence of additional security headers such as HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy represents an area for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Compliance with GDPR is supported by the use of Cookiebot and a linked comprehensive privacy policy. Incident response and security policy documentation are not publicly available, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the security culture appears adequate for the business type but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement additional security headers including HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure they remain secure and privacy-compliant.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
POVED - Plzeňský organizátor veřejné dopravy
Description
Provides integrated public transportation services and information for the Plzeň region including schedules, fare calculators, and service updates.
Key services
Public transport schedules, Fare calculation, Service updates and alerts, Mobile virtual card application
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, reCAPTCHA, HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for bot protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or registry restrictions.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie categorization.
  4. Multiple external trusted domains are linked, including Google and Facebook services.
  5. Contact phone number is clearly displayed with infoline label.
  6. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service URLs found on main page but privacy policy is linked via Cookiebot.
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page.
  8. No email addresses explicitly found in the HTML content.
  9. Website uses modern tracking and analytics tools with consent.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with integrations of Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Cookiebot for consent management. The site uses reCAPTCHA for bot mitigation. The meta tags and Open Graph tags are properly configured for SEO and social sharing. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, and the site includes basic accessibility features. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The site could benefit from enhanced security headers and improved accessibility compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with opportunities for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100Medium21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with idpk.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review idpk.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.