Skip to main content

Security report for idm.lt

IDM Group · Transportation · Lithuania

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

IDM Group is a medium-sized business operating primarily in the transport, forwarding, warehousing, distribution, and IT services sectors, with over 20 years of experience. The website presents basic business information and targets companies requiring complex logistics and IT solutions. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress CMS with a variety of JavaScript libraries for enhanced UI/UX, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the website lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features and has only basic mobile optimization. Security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS verification in the data provided, absence of security headers, and no visible security policies or contact points for incident response. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, which negatively impacts trust and legitimacy assessment. Overall, the site is functional but requires significant improvements in security, privacy compliance, and transparency to enhance business credibility and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching idm.lt

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as an experienced service provider in transport and IT sectors, offering complex logistics and IT services. The business model is service-oriented, targeting other businesses needing integrated transport and IT solutions. The website content is basic but consistent with the stated business sectors. There is no evidence of partnerships, certifications, or detailed business registrations on the site. The lack of contact information and privacy policies limits the ability to fully assess business credibility. The company appears to have a stable market presence but could benefit from enhanced digital marketing and transparency to improve competitive advantage.

Security posture

The security maturity level is low to moderate. The absence of HTTPS confirmation in the data, missing security headers, and lack of visible security policies or incident response contacts indicate gaps in security best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content, but the use of multiple third-party libraries requires regular updates to mitigate risks. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also suggests non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. Incident response readiness is not evident, and no security certifications or vulnerability disclosure programs are present. These factors collectively increase the risk profile and reduce user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and verify configuration
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  3. Publish clear contact information including security incident response contacts
  4. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and publish a security.txt file
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
IDM Group
Description
Creative solutions and high performance are the main tools we use to grow our businesses. Our experience in business more than 20 years. We offer our services in the field of complex transport and forwarding, warehousing and distribution, IT services and…
Key services
complex transport and forwarding, warehousing and distribution, IT services
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Fonts, Flickity, Flexslider, LightGallery, SimpleBar, Isotope, TweenMax, Anime.js, Vivus, Three.js, WordPress
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit exceeded
  3. Website uses WordPress CMS with multiple JS libraries
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found
  6. No security headers detected in provided data
  7. No analytics or tracking services detected
  8. Content is basic with moderate branding consistency
  9. Business appears to operate in transport and IT sectors
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with a range of JavaScript libraries including jQuery, Flickity, Flexslider, LightGallery, and Three.js, indicating a moderately complex front-end. Google Fonts are used for typography. The site appears to be moderately optimized for mobile devices but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with some optimization possible in resource loading and caching. Hosting provider details are not available. The technical stack is modern but requires ongoing maintenance to ensure security and performance. There is no evidence of advanced backend frameworks or cloud services from the data provided.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with idm.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review idm.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.