Skip to main content

Security report for ideracorp.com

Idera, Inc. · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and GDPR outside view.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Idera, Inc. is a global B2B software company specializing in a broad portfolio of productivity tools for database management, application development, test management, and IT infrastructure monitoring. The company operates multiple software brands and has recently expanded through acquisitions such as Hexawise, Yellowfin, and Filestack, indicating a growth-oriented strategy in the software tools market. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image targeting technical users and enterprise customers seeking efficient software solutions. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap, and Google Fonts, and implements a cookie consent mechanism, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of explicit privacy and terms of service pages and lack of visible contact information limit transparency. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but no visible security headers or incident response contacts. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy but does not detract from the professional presentation of the website. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced compliance and security disclosures.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of ideracorp.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ideracorp.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ideracorp.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for ideracorp.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Idera, Inc. positions itself as a key player in the B2B software productivity sector, leveraging a diverse portfolio of brands that cover database tools, developer tools, and test/security tools. The company’s business model focuses on acquiring and managing specialized software brands to serve technical professionals and enterprises. The presence of multiple acquisitions suggests active market consolidation and expansion. The target customers are technical users and enterprises requiring robust software solutions for database management, application development, and testing. The website’s content and branding consistency support a strong market presence, although the lack of detailed company background and contact information online may limit direct customer engagement. The company appears to maintain a broad partnership and subsidiary ecosystem, enhancing its competitive advantage through diversified offerings.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is used, ensuring encrypted communications, and a cookie consent mechanism is in place, indicating some privacy awareness. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS were detected, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. There is no visible privacy policy or terms of service, which are critical for compliance with regulations like GDPR. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting transparency and readiness for security incidents. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, potentially indicating privacy protection or domain registration issues. Overall, while the site is not evidently vulnerable, it lacks several best practices that would strengthen its security and compliance posture.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and transparency.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance web security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts to improve trust and readiness.
  4. Verify and ensure domain WHOIS information is accurate and publicly available to enhance legitimacy.
  5. Improve accessibility features and SEO metadata to enhance user experience and search visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Idera, Inc.
Description
Idera, Inc. brands deliver the B2B software tools that technical users trust most. From database administration to application development to test management, our solutions help you do more for less so you can achieve your strategic goals.
Key services
Database management tools, Application development tools, Test management tools, IT infrastructure monitoring, Data integration and synchronization, Low-code development platforms, Embedded analytics and BI
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, Bootstrap 4.3.1, Google Fonts (Montserrat), Cookie Script (cookie consent)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS implied by URL scheme
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookie Script
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and branding.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via third-party script.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on homepage.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, indicating possible domain registration or privacy issues.
  6. Multiple software brands and acquisitions prominently displayed.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data.
  8. No forms detected on homepage for data collection.
  9. No social media links explicitly found in HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end technology stack including jQuery, jQuery UI, Bootstrap 4.3.1, and Google Fonts, which supports responsive design and a good user experience on mobile devices. The site includes a cookie consent script from a third party, indicating some attention to privacy compliance. Performance appears moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading, but no advanced performance optimization techniques were detected. The site lacks a detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. There is no evidence of advanced frameworks or platforms. The absence of security headers and incomplete SEO metadata indicate areas for technical improvement. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ideracorp.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ideracorp.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.