Skip to main content

Security report for iczgroup.com

ICZ Group · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ICZ Group is a Czech-based technology company specializing in integrated software and network solutions. The company positions itself as a partner to businesses seeking to improve operational efficiency through IT systems and services. The website reflects a professional B2B service provider with a focus on delivering comprehensive IT solutions. The digital infrastructure is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and Divi Builder, indicating a mature and maintainable web presence. The site supports multiple languages, enhancing accessibility for regional clients. Security-wise, the website enforces HTTPS, uses Google reCAPTCHA, and manages cookie consent via Cookiebot, demonstrating compliance with privacy regulations. However, the absence of explicit security headers and lack of published security policies suggest room for improvement in security transparency. The missing WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which impacts overall trust. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response and security policies, and clarifying domain registration details to improve credibility.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of iczgroup.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching iczgroup.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ICZ Group operates in the technology sector, targeting business clients requiring IT infrastructure and software solutions. Their business model is service-oriented, focusing on delivering tailored IT systems and network integration. The company appears to have a medium-sized footprint with a regional presence in the Czech Republic. The website content and structured data confirm a consistent brand identity and professional market positioning. The use of multilingual support and advanced marketing tools like Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot indicates a strategic approach to customer engagement and compliance. However, the lack of visible contact details and corporate certifications may limit trust among prospective clients. The company could benefit from enhancing transparency and providing more detailed business information to strengthen market confidence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and integration of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. Cookie consent management is robust, leveraging Cookiebot with detailed cookie categorization and user controls, aligning with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates limited security transparency and preparedness. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a significant concern, potentially indicating registration issues or privacy protection that is not justified for this business type. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved by adopting best practices in header configuration and policy publication.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish clear security policies and incident response procedures on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program, including a security.txt file, to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Clarify domain registration details and ensure WHOIS information is accurate and publicly available to strengthen domain legitimacy.
  5. Add explicit company contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and customer trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ICZ Group
Description
ICZ je dodavatelem informačních technologií, systémů a služeb, ale především partnerem, který pomůže dosáhnout vyšší efektivity podnikání našich klientů.
Key services
Information technology supply, Systems and services, Software and network integrated solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Divi Builder, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Google AdSense
Tracking pixels
Google Ads, LinkedIn, Seznam.cz
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Uses Cookiebot for cookie consent management with detailed cookie categories.
  3. Implements Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking and marketing.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage HTML.
  5. No visible terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  6. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible domain registration or WHOIS privacy issues.
  7. Website content is in Czech with multilingual support (English and Slovak).
  8. Site uses WordPress CMS with Divi Builder and Yoast SEO plugin.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found.
  10. No data protection officer contact found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress platform using the Divi Builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and SEO-optimized infrastructure. The presence of Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot scripts shows integration with advanced marketing and compliance tools. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and includes accessibility considerations, though these could be enhanced further. Performance appears moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of CDN-hosted libraries. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML source. The site lacks explicit hosting provider information. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from improved accessibility features and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with iczgroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review iczgroup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.