Skip to main content

Security report for iclosed.io

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

iClosed is a technology company offering an AI-powered scheduling solution designed to enhance the productivity of high-ticket sales teams by capturing more qualified leads and disqualifying non-buyers. The website presents a professional and modern design, leveraging advanced analytics tools such as PostHog and Facebook Pixel to monitor user interactions. However, the absence of publicly available WHOIS data due to privacy protection limits transparency about the domain ownership. The site lacks explicit privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which impacts compliance and trustworthiness. Security posture is moderate with no visible security headers and unknown SSL configuration, suggesting room for improvement in technical security measures. Overall, the business appears legitimate and focused on a niche SaaS market, but would benefit from enhanced transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching iclosed.io

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
87
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets sales teams dealing with high-value transactions, positioning itself as a specialized SaaS provider in the AI scheduling and lead capture space. The business model revolves around improving sales efficiency through AI-driven qualification and scheduling automation. The use of modern web technologies and analytics indicates a digitally mature operation, though the lack of detailed business information and contact data suggests a small or early-stage enterprise. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website content. The market positioning appears focused on technology-driven sales enablement, with potential for growth if compliance and trust signals are strengthened.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS as indicated by external script sources but lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content analysis. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response contacts, indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The use of reputable analytics and tracking services is noted, but without clear user consent mechanisms. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident from the site. Enhancing security headers, publishing compliance documents, and providing clear contact channels would improve the security posture significantly.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add visible contact information including support and security incident response emails.
  3. Configure and enforce security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Conduct a security audit to verify SSL/TLS configuration and remediate any weaknesses.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide clear user consent mechanisms for tracking and data collection.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Boost sales and save time. iClosed scheduler captures up to 200% more leads by collecting info before showing time slots — while disqualifying non-buyers.
Key services
AI scheduling, Lead capture, Sales team productivity
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, PostHog analytics, Facebook Pixel, Framer CMS
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, PostHog, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, PostHog
Marketing tools
PostHog
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to malformed query and privacy protection.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No explicit contact information such as emails or phone numbers found.
  5. Site uses modern analytics and tracking tools including PostHog and Facebook Pixel.
  6. Content is focused on AI scheduling for sales teams, indicating a niche SaaS product.
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data; SSL status unknown.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information present.
  9. Website design and content quality are good with consistent branding.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Framer CMS with integration of modern analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, PostHog, and Facebook Pixel. The technical implementation shows good SEO practices with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Mobile optimization is good, ensuring usability across devices. However, the lack of security headers and incomplete compliance documentation indicate technical debt in security and privacy areas. There is an opportunity to improve technical robustness by adopting best practices in web security and privacy compliance frameworks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with iclosed.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review iclosed.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.