Skip to main content

Security report for icdparchitects.com

ICDP ARCHITECTS · Real Estate · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ICDP ARCHITECTS is a small architectural firm based in Ibrox, Scotland, providing architectural design and consultation services. The website is hosted on the Wix platform and uses Wix's standard technology stack, including Wix Thunderbolt and JavaScript. The site content is basic but professional, targeting a general audience interested in architectural services. The business appears to be local or regional with no indication of a larger corporate structure. Technically, the website is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has basic SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and policies. No privacy or cookie policies were found, indicating potential compliance gaps. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the website is functional but would benefit from enhanced security, privacy compliance, and clearer business credibility indicators.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching icdparchitects.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
69
Security headers
40
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the Real Estate sector as an architectural service provider. Its market position appears to be local or regional with a focus on direct client services. The business model is service-based, relying on architectural design and consultation. There is no evidence of partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent companies. The website lacks comprehensive business information such as founding year or certifications, which limits competitive intelligence. The absence of social media and email contacts reduces customer engagement opportunities. The company could improve its market presence by adding more detailed business information and trust signals.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options, which help mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is provided, and there is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential GDPR compliance issues. The WHOIS data is missing, which may indicate privacy protection or an unregistered domain, reducing trust. Overall, the security posture is basic and could be significantly improved by implementing recommended security headers, privacy policies, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and improve user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance website security.
  3. Publish terms of service and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Verify and publish domain registration details to improve business credibility and trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search engine ranking.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ICDP ARCHITECTS
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ICDP ARCHITECTS
Description
ICDP ARCHITECTS is an architectural business located in Ibrox, Scotland, providing architectural services.
Key services
architectural design, consultation
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Wix, JavaScript, JSON-LD, CSS
Frameworks
Wix Thunderbolt
Platforms
Wix.com
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix scripts and styles
  2. No WHOIS data available indicating possible unregistered or privacy-protected domain
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. Contact information limited to phone and physical address in structured data
  5. No email addresses or social media links found
  6. No security headers detected in provided data
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
  8. Content is minimal and basic, focused on architectural services
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content
  10. No WAF or blocking detected, site is accessible
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform using Wix Thunderbolt framework and standard JavaScript libraries. It loads resources from Wix's CDN and uses JSON-LD structured data for local business information. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has basic accessibility features. Performance appears moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading. The technical stack is modern but limited to Wix's ecosystem, which may restrict customization. There is no evidence of advanced analytics or tracking tools. The site would benefit from improved SEO meta tags and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with icdparchitects.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review icdparchitects.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.