Skip to main content

Security report for iblsprog.dk

Ibl sprogservice - www.ibl.dk · Education management · Denmark

Partial score · DNS & email only

57/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scanned

4 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
3of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching iblsprog.dk

This scan found 8 issues across 2 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

Security headers
25
GDPR outside view
88
Average
57

Not counted

  • SSL/TLS: did not complete in this scan.
  • Email security: did not complete in this scan.
  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • Network security: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets individuals and organizations in Denmark seeking language training services. Its business model revolves around providing tailored language courses, leveraging a strong market position as a dedicated and quality-focused provider. The website's integration with WooCommerce suggests potential e-commerce capabilities for course bookings or materials. Marketing efforts include Google Ads and retargeting via Facebook Pixel, indicating active customer acquisition strategies. The absence of explicit company registration or VAT information on the site limits deeper business verification. The use of multiple analytics and heatmap tools reflects a data-driven approach to user experience optimization.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms. The inclusion of Google reCAPTCHA helps mitigate automated abuse. However, the lack of explicit security headers in the HTML and absence of a published security policy or vulnerability disclosure program represent gaps. No incident response or abuse contact information is provided, which could hinder timely reporting and resolution of security issues. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The security score is moderate, with recommendations to enhance transparency and implement additional security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and publicly disclose a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  3. Add explicit security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact information to facilitate security issue reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet broader compliance and usability standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
IBL Sprogservice
Description
Sprogkurser på dine præmisser. Hos os er ingen opgave for stor eller for lille. Vi møder dig lige der, hvor du er. Vi ved, at alle lærer forskelligt, og det er derfor, vi tilpasser vores sprogkurser, så de passer til dig.
Key services
Customized language courses, Language training services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Elementor, WPBakery Page Builder, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Mouseflow, Aurora Heatmap, jQuery
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with blocking mode
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reCAPTCHA script (Google reCAPTCHA v3)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Mouseflow, Aurora Heatmap
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (AW-986734472)
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Mouseflow, Aurora Heatmap
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Mailchimp
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally built WordPress site focused on language courses in Denmark.
  2. Uses multiple modern marketing and analytics tools with cookie consent.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Contact information is primarily via contact forms; no explicit emails or phone numbers found in HTML.
  5. Security posture is good with HTTPS and some security best practices but lacks explicit security policies.
  6. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content is fully accessible.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with iblsprog.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review iblsprog.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

iblsprog.dk security report (partial scan) | Guard