Skip to main content

Security report for ibg.social

Ibg proreact · Information technology and services · Denmark

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
5of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ibg.social

This scan found 16 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
63

Not counted

  • Email security: did not complete in this scan.
  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

IBG Proreact's market positioning leverages its specialized assistive technology for social care, offering unique communication tools that address the needs of vulnerable populations. Its business model focuses on B2B SaaS and service delivery to care institutions and municipalities. The company benefits from its parent company Evryone's backing, enhancing credibility and reach. The website content and customer stories indicate a focus on user empowerment and digital inclusion. Growth potential exists in expanding digital care solutions across Nordic countries. The partnership ecosystem includes Evryone, but no other partners are explicitly mentioned. Revenue streams likely include software licensing, support services, and hardware integration. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance security transparency and expand multilingual support.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS and privacy-aware analytics configuration. However, it lacks comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No public security policy or incident response contact is published, which is a compliance gap. Forms collect personal data but no explicit mention of secure transmission beyond HTTPS or anti-CSRF measures is found. GDPR compliance is indicated by the presence of privacy and cookie policies, though no explicit cookie consent mechanism is implemented. Overall, the security culture appears basic but adequate for the business scope, with room for improvement in transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Add an explicit cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply fully with GDPR cookie requirements.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and provide incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  4. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and remediate potential risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility compliance to improve usability for all users and meet legal standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
IBG Proreact
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
IBG Proreact
Description
IBG Social provides an interactive citizen guide platform designed to strengthen independence, community, and security for people needing daily support. It supports communication and participation for people with cognitive and physical disabilities, offering tools for residential care, home support, day and activity centers, and health and care facilities.
Key services
Interactive touch screen communication platform, Mobile app for users and caregivers, Video call service for virtual support, Group communication and activity management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Fonts (Source Sans Pro), Matomo Analytics, jQuery 3.5.1, Lottie animations, AWS hosting (cdn.prod.website-files.com), JavaScript
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Disable cookies in Matomo analytics for privacy

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Danish with some Norwegian and German language options.
  3. Multiple contact methods including phone, email, and contact forms are available.
  4. No explicit terms of service page found.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present but lack explicit consent mechanisms.
  6. Use of Matomo analytics with cookies disabled indicates privacy-conscious tracking.
  7. Website uses modern web technologies and is hosted on AWS CDN.
  8. No social media links detected in the provided content.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  10. Business is part of the Evryone group, indicating corporate backing.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ibg.social. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ibg.social.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.