Skip to main content

Security report for humanitix.com

Humanitix · Non-profit · United Kingdom

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Humanitix is a socially responsible ticketing platform that channels 100% of its booking fee profits to charitable causes focused on education, healthcare, and basic human necessities. Established in 2005, it has positioned itself as a niche leader in ethical event ticketing, serving event organizers and attendees who value social impact. The website demonstrates a mature technical infrastructure leveraging modern frameworks like Next.js and React, hosted via Cloudflare with integration of Google Maps API and other third-party services. The site is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and provides a seamless user experience with clear navigation and rich content. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protections in place, though improvements are needed in DNSSEC adoption and security headers. Privacy compliance is currently weak due to the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the platform is trustworthy and credible but should enhance transparency and security practices to meet higher compliance standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching humanitix.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention humanitix.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
345
Employees
0
Customers
341
Third parties
4
Weak passwords
6%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for humanitix.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Humanitix operates in the non-profit sector with a unique business model that converts ticket booking fees into charitable donations, differentiating it from traditional ticketing services. Its partnerships with reputable organizations such as UN Women, TEDx, Google.org, and others strengthen its market position and credibility. The platform targets socially conscious event hosts and attendees, offering features like branded event pages and integrated design tools. Revenue streams primarily come from booking fees, with a focus on maximizing charitable contributions. The company maintains a medium-sized presence with a long operational history, indicating stability and growth potential. Strategic partnerships and a strong ethical brand identity are key competitive advantages. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for managed communication channels via forms and support portals.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses domain status flags to prevent unauthorized domain changes, reflecting a good baseline security posture. However, the lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security represent gaps that could expose the site to DNS spoofing or clickjacking attacks. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which limits transparency and readiness communication. The use of third-party scripts like Google Maps and Facebook Pixel introduces potential privacy and security considerations. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but can be significantly improved by adopting recommended best practices and publishing clear security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish detailed privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance statements and consent mechanisms.
  4. Create and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Humanitix
Description
Humanitix is a ticketing platform that dedicates 100% of profits from booking fees to charities providing education, healthcare, and basic necessities worldwide.
Key services
Event ticketing, Event hosting, Charity donations from booking fees
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google Maps API, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Client-side security flags on domain (clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Google Fonts, Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on the analyzed page.
  3. Contact information is primarily via contact forms; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  4. Strong branding and consistent messaging focused on charity and social impact.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and good mobile optimization.
  6. Security headers and DNSSEC are missing, representing an area for improvement.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. External links include reputable partners and charity organizations.
  9. Tracking via Facebook Pixel detected; privacy compliance could be enhanced.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, ensuring a performant and scalable front-end. Hosting via Cloudflare provides CDN and security benefits. Integration with Google Maps API and external fonts enhances functionality and aesthetics. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with good SEO practices evident from meta tags and structured data. However, the absence of some security headers and DNSSEC indicates technical debt in security hardening. Performance appears fast with preloading and deferred scripts. The technical stack is well-chosen for a modern SaaS/non-profit platform but requires incremental improvements in security and privacy compliance to align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with humanitix.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review humanitix.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.