Skip to main content

Security report for hradkrasov.cz

Spolek pro ochranu přírodní rezervace a hradu Krašova · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.hradkrasov.cz represents a non-profit organization dedicated to the preservation and promotion of the historical site Hrad Krašov in the Czech Republic. The organization operates the castle ruins, organizes cultural and historical events, and provides visitor information. The site targets tourists, history enthusiasts, and local community members, offering event calendars, visitor guidelines, and opportunities to support the castle's restoration. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor and uses modern plugins for event management and downloads. It incorporates Google Tag Manager and CookieYes for analytics and privacy compliance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent, though some security headers are not explicitly detected. The site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms, and contact information is clearly provided, enhancing trust. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which is reasonable for this type of organization. Overall, the site is professional, user-friendly, and compliant with privacy regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hradkrasov.cz

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
75
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention hradkrasov.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for hradkrasov.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization positions itself as a regional cultural heritage non-profit, leveraging community engagement and events to attract visitors and funding. Its business model relies on donations, event participation, and entrance fees. The website's integration with local media partners and tourism platforms indicates strategic partnerships to enhance visibility. The presence of social media channels supports outreach and community building. The lack of detailed corporate data suggests a small-sized entity focused on heritage preservation rather than commercial activities. The website content quality and navigation support effective communication of its mission and services.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism in place, indicating awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not detected, which could be improved to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. The absence of a security.txt file or incident response contact points suggests limited formal security incident management. Regular updates and security audits are recommended to maintain and enhance security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Establish a security.txt file and provide clear incident response contact information to improve vulnerability disclosure and incident handling.
  3. Ensure all WordPress plugins and themes are regularly updated to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  4. Verify HTTPS enforcement at the server level to prevent any unencrypted access.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic audits to improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Spolek pro ochranu přírodní rezervace a hradu Krašova
Description
Romantická zřícenina Krašova v Kralovicích je jedním z nejdéle dochovaných historických klenotů Plzeňského kraje. Spolek vlastní, provozuje a snaží se uchovat hrad pro další generace. Nabízí informace o historii, návštěvnických službách, akcích a možnostech pomoci hradu.
Key services
Provoz hradu Krašova, Organizace kulturních a historických akcí, Informace pro návštěvníky, Veřejná sbírka a podpora obnovy hradu
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, CookieYes (cookie consent), Download Manager plugin, The Events Calendar plugin
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating possible privacy protection or domain registration issues.
  3. Site uses modern WordPress plugins and frameworks with active event calendar and community engagement.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented in compliance with GDPR.
  5. Contact information is clearly presented with official email and phone number.
  6. No security headers explicitly detected in HTML but HTTPS is used.
  7. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found.
  9. Social media presence is strong with Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube links.
  10. No suspicious or malicious external domains detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder, supported by plugins such as The Events Calendar and Download Manager. It employs jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics and script management. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate, with some lazy loading and caching implied. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The technical stack is appropriate for a small non-profit organization, though opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility compliance. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hradkrasov.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hradkrasov.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.