Skip to main content

Security report for hoveniersbedrijfstal.nl

Stal Hoveniers · Real Estate · Netherlands

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Stal Hoveniers is a small, local landscaping and gardening company based in Dordrecht, Netherlands, specializing in garden design, construction, maintenance, and paving services. The company targets both residential and commercial clients in Dordrecht and surrounding areas, positioning itself as a reliable and professional service provider with a focus on quality and customer satisfaction. The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and incorporates modern web technologies and SEO best practices, providing a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, supporting the business's credibility in its local market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hoveniersbedrijfstal.nl

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
28
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the Real Estate sector focusing on outdoor landscaping services. Its business model is service-oriented, providing tailored garden solutions including design, construction, and maintenance. The website content and testimonials indicate a customer-centric approach with a good reputation locally. The company leverages digital marketing tools like Usermaven for analytics but does not appear to engage in extensive advertising or affiliate programs. The domain age and WHOIS data align with the business's establishment timeline, supporting legitimacy. The company maintains a Facebook presence but limited social media footprint otherwise.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses lazy loading for performance optimization. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security contact information is published, which is a gap in security transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism may pose compliance risks under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to ensure compliance with EU cookie laws and GDPR.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider enabling DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Stal Hoveniers
Description
Stal Hoveniers is a professional gardening and landscaping company based in Dordrecht, Netherlands, offering services such as garden design, garden construction, maintenance, paving, and related outdoor projects. They serve both private and business clients in Dordrecht and surrounding areas.
Key services
Tuinontwerp (Garden design), Tuinaanleg (Garden construction), Aanleg (sier) bestrating (Paving installation), Tuinonderhoud (Garden maintenance), Stratenmaker (Paving specialist), Tuinman (Gardener)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Rank Math SEO, Rocket Lazy Load
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Use of lazy loading for performance

Analytics and tracking

Services
Usermaven
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Usermaven
Marketing tools
Usermaven analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and relevant content.
  2. Contact information is prominently displayed and includes multiple channels.
  3. No cookie consent mechanism detected, which may be a compliance gap.
  4. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  7. Social media presence limited to Facebook link.
  8. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with Elementor page builder, leveraging jQuery and Rank Math SEO plugin for optimization. It uses Rocket Lazy Load scripts to improve loading performance. Hosting is provided by team.blue nl B.V., a reputable Dutch hosting provider. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading and lazy loading images. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No critical technical debt or risks were identified, but security enhancements are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hoveniersbedrijfstal.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hoveniersbedrijfstal.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.