Skip to main content

Security report for hoptrans.eu

HOPTRANS · Transportation · Lithuania

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hoptrans is a Lithuanian-based logistics company specializing in intelligent logistics services including road, air, railway, sea freight, e-commerce logistics, and multimodal transport. The company demonstrates a solid market position with significant cargo volumes and order execution metrics, targeting businesses requiring comprehensive freight and transport solutions. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and good content quality, supporting a medium-sized enterprise profile in the transportation sector. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern libraries such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and Owl Carousel, with integrations for Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Google reCAPTCHA. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, though performance is moderate. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and basic security practices observed, but lacks explicit security headers and detailed security policies. The security evaluation reveals no critical vulnerabilities but highlights areas for improvement such as implementing security headers, enhancing form security, and publishing incident response policies. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism present, indicating GDPR awareness but lacking advanced compliance features. Overall, Hoptrans presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with room for security and compliance enhancements. Strategic recommendations include strengthening security headers, formalizing security and incident response documentation, and improving form protections to elevate the security posture and trustworthiness further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hoptrans.eu

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
43
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Hoptrans operates in the competitive logistics and transportation market, offering a broad range of freight services across multiple modalities. Their business model focuses on providing integrated logistics solutions to businesses, including e-commerce logistics, which is a growing segment. The company leverages digital tools for customer engagement and operational efficiency, as evidenced by their online presence and service offerings. Their social media engagement and structured data usage indicate a focus on digital marketing and SEO. The absence of parent or subsidiary companies suggests an independent medium-sized enterprise. The company’s consistent branding and clear contact information support customer trust and accessibility.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, and provides a cookie consent banner linked to a privacy policy, demonstrating baseline security and privacy awareness. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. The login form lacks visible CSRF tokens or advanced protections, which could be a vector for attacks if not properly secured server-side. No incident response or security policy pages are present, indicating limited transparency and preparedness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced technical controls and documented policies to meet higher compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve browser security.
  2. Develop and publish explicit security and incident response policies to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  3. Enhance login and other form security by adding CSRF tokens, input validation, and secure handling of credentials.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Expand privacy compliance measures beyond basic cookie consent and privacy policy to include data retention policies and user rights management.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
UAB "Interneto vizija"
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
HOPTRANS
Description
Hoptrans provides intelligent logistics services including road freight, air freight, railway freight, sea freight, e-commerce logistics, and multimodal transport solutions.
Key services
Road Freight, Air Freight, Railway Freight, Sea Freight, E-Commerce Logistics, Multimodal
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 4.3.1, Font Awesome 4.7.0, Owl Carousel, Wickedpicker, TaffyDB, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA, LinkedIn Insight Tag, YouTube Embed Plus
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on forms
  • Cookie consent banner with privacy policy link
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
LinkedIn Insight Tag
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  2. Cookie consent banner present with link to privacy policy
  3. No explicit terms of service page found
  4. Contact information clearly displayed in footer
  5. Social media presence on Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram
  6. Website built on WordPress with common plugins
  7. No visible security headers in provided data
  8. Login form present but with minimal visible security controls
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies found
  10. Good SEO metadata and structured data present
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern front-end stack including Bootstrap 4.3.1, jQuery, Owl Carousel, and Font Awesome. It integrates Google Analytics and LinkedIn Insight Tag for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile optimized and uses Google Fonts for typography. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of analytics and reCAPTCHA scripts. The site lacks explicit security headers which is a technical debt. The use of multiple JavaScript libraries and plugins indicates a mature but potentially complex front-end environment that requires regular maintenance to avoid vulnerabilities. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA roles and better semantic markup.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hoptrans.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hoptrans.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.