Skip to main content

Security report for hoekstraenvaneck.nl

Hoekstra en Van Eck · Real Estate · Netherlands

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hoekstra en Van Eck is a well-established Dutch real estate agency founded in 1996, offering a comprehensive range of services including buying, selling, new construction, mortgages, and insurance. The company targets home buyers and sellers in the Netherlands and maintains a strong market presence with multiple office locations and a high customer satisfaction rating. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and user experience. Technically, the site employs modern tracking and marketing technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Cookiebot for consent management, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and DNSSEC enabled, though explicit security headers and policies are not evident. Privacy compliance is partial, with cookie consent mechanisms present but no explicit privacy or terms of service pages found. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained, but could improve transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hoekstraenvaneck.nl

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
100
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate sector with a business model focused on brokerage and integrated financial services like mortgages and insurance. Its competitive advantage lies in combining real estate and financial services under one roof, supported by modern digital tools and a strong regional presence. The target customer segment includes individuals looking to buy or sell homes in the Netherlands. The website's integration with partner domains for valuation and insurance services suggests a collaborative ecosystem. Growth indicators include a large portfolio of properties and active content updates. Strategic observations highlight the need for enhanced privacy and security policy disclosures to align with regulatory expectations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS and DNSSEC enabled, reducing risks related to transport and DNS spoofing attacks. The presence of cookie consent scripts indicates awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies represent gaps in security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The use of multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Incident response readiness and data protection officer contact information are not publicly available, which could impact compliance and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages prominently on the website.
  2. Implement and document a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible to users.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  4. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and ensure compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hoekstra en Van Eck
Description
Hoekstra en Van Eck is a real estate agency offering services including buying, selling, new construction, mortgages, and insurance. They provide personalized service with expertise in negotiation and market knowledge, targeting home buyers and sellers in the Netherlands.
Key services
Buying homes, Selling homes, New construction projects, Mortgage services, Insurance services, Valuation services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Microsoft Clarity, Smartsupp Chat, Tiny Slider (tns), Universal Script (ubembed)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • DNSSEC enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Smartsupp Chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with active scripts.
  4. Multiple external tracking and marketing scripts are used, including Microsoft Clarity and Facebook Pixel.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  6. Structured data (JSON-LD) is well implemented with organization and aggregate rating.
  7. Website targets Dutch-speaking users (language nl-NL).
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  10. Website uses HTTPS and DNSSEC, indicating good domain and transport security.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based frontend with integration of multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The presence of Tiny Slider (tns) indicates use of responsive carousels for content display. The site is mobile optimized with responsive images and viewport settings. No explicit CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, canonical links, and structured data in JSON-LD format. Hosting provider details are not explicit in the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional user experience but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security header implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hoekstraenvaneck.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hoekstraenvaneck.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.