Skip to main content

Security report for hoefnagels.com

Hoefnagels Fire Safety · Real Estate · Netherlands

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hoefnagels Fire Safety is a specialized Dutch company focused on fire safety solutions, providing advice, products, and services to protect buildings and people from fire, smoke, and intrusion damage. The company targets architects, contractors, and building owners with a comprehensive approach including proprietary products and certified staff. Their market position is that of a niche expert with a strong brand presence in the Netherlands. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Analytics, and Hotjar, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is implied but no explicit security headers or privacy policies are present, which are areas for improvement. The WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about domain registration transparency but does not negate the professional appearance and business legitimacy of the site. Overall, the website is professional, content-rich, and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hoefnagels.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate and safety sector, offering essential fire safety products and consultancy services. Their business model is B2B, focusing on building safety compliance and maintenance. The presence of a webshop and career site indicates diversified revenue streams and growth orientation. Partnerships with local firms for website realization show a collaborative ecosystem. The company holds a Royal Warrant, enhancing credibility. The website content and structure support a professional image aimed at safety-conscious clients in the Netherlands. Growth indicators include continuous product development and training services. The company’s market niche and proprietary products provide competitive advantages.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and includes tracking scripts from reputable analytics providers. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, and no data protection officer contact is visible, indicating gaps in compliance with GDPR and NIS2 frameworks. The lack of privacy and cookie policies further weakens privacy compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The company should prioritize implementing security headers, formal privacy notices, and incident response contacts to improve security culture and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Add HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure information with dedicated contact channels.
  4. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any vulnerable or outdated libraries and scripts.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Hoefnagels Fire Safety
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hoefnagels Fire Safety
Description
Hoefnagels Fire Safety beschermt mensen én gebouwen tegen de schade van vuur, rook en inbraak. Het bedrijf richt zich volledig op brandveilige compartimentering van gebouwen en levert totaaloplossingen inclusief advies, producten en services.
Key services
Advies (Advice), Producten (Products), Services (Maintenance, Repairs)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.4.1, Bootstrap, Slick Carousel, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Material Design Icons, Ubuntu Google Font
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by external scripts loaded over HTTPS
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No privacy or cookie policy found despite GDPR relevance
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with email, phone, and address
  4. No visible security headers or explicit security policies
  5. WHOIS data missing, raising domain registration transparency concerns
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  7. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and Slick Carousel for interactive sliders. Google Analytics and Hotjar are used for user behavior tracking and analytics. The site loads external scripts asynchronously to improve performance. The HTML structure is valid and SEO optimized with meta tags and descriptive titles. Mobile optimization is good with responsive navigation and search features. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the HTML. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and script optimization. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but provides basic support. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and functional user experience with room for security and compliance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hoefnagels.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hoefnagels.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.