Skip to main content

Security report for hldmark.lv

SIA HLD · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA HLD operates the website hldmark.lv, providing office equipment sales, cartridge refilling, and technical servicing primarily in the Ogre region of Latvia. Founded in 2000, the company offers a broad range of products including printers, copiers, cartridges, and office supplies, alongside services such as repair, maintenance, and equipment rental. The website reflects a regional retail and service business with a focus on customer support and product variety. Technically, the site uses common web technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap, Materialize, and Google Analytics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is average, with HTTPS assumed but lacking visible security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but the website content and business information appear consistent and professional. Overall, the site is functional and informative but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hldmark.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets both business and individual customers in Latvia, focusing on office technology and related services. Its competitive advantage lies in offering comprehensive services from product sales to maintenance and cartridge refilling, supported by a local presence and client portfolio including municipal and corporate clients. The business model combines retail sales with service contracts and equipment rental, generating diversified revenue streams. The website's client logos and detailed terms of service enhance credibility. Growth potential exists through expanding service locations and improving digital presence. Partnerships with known brands like Canon, HP, and Ricoh support market positioning. The company maintains a moderate branding consistency and content quality, suitable for its regional market niche.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and standard JavaScript libraries but lacks advanced security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS, which could mitigate common web threats. No explicit privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps. The contact form collects user data but no visible CAPTCHA or anti-spam measures are noted. Google Analytics is used for tracking, raising privacy considerations. The absence of incident response contacts or security policies suggests limited formal security governance. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, with room for improvement in headers, privacy notices, and data protection practices to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance site security.
  3. Regularly update and audit JavaScript libraries to prevent vulnerabilities from outdated components.
  4. Introduce CAPTCHA or other anti-spam measures on contact forms to reduce abuse risk.
  5. Develop and publish a security incident response policy and contact information to improve transparency and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA HLD
VAT number
LV40003519112
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA HLD
Description
Uzņēmums dibināts 2000. gadā, piedāvā biroja tehnikas, izejmateriālu un aprīkojuma tirdzniecību, kārtridžu uzpildi un biroja tehnikas servisa pakalpojumus Latvijā, īpaši Ogres novadā un tuvākajā reģionā.
Key services
Printeru, kopētāju, kārtridžu tirdzniecība, Kārtridžu uzpilde un atjaunošana, Printeru un datoru remonts, Biroja tehnikas noma, Dokumentu kopēšana, drukāšana, skenēšana
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Materialize, Swiper, FancyBox, Google Analytics, Google Maps API
Frameworks
Bootstrap, Materialize
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed (based on URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, physical address, and contact form.
  4. Terms of service are present and detailed, covering warranty and return policies.
  5. No explicit security headers or advanced security policies detected.
  6. Use of multiple JavaScript libraries and frameworks for UI and functionality.
  7. Google Analytics and Tag Manager used for tracking with moderate user tracking level.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a combination of Bootstrap and Materialize CSS frameworks, with jQuery and Swiper for interactive elements. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are integrated for user tracking. The site appears moderately optimized for mobile devices and has a clear navigation structure. However, no CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Performance is moderate, with multiple external scripts potentially impacting load times. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal but present through meta tags. The lack of visible security headers and privacy mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the data provided.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hldmark.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hldmark.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.