Skip to main content

Security report for hirschlerlaw.com

Hirschler Fleischer · Real Estate · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hirschler Fleischer is a professional law firm based in Virginia, providing a broad range of legal services with a focus on client success and complex legal issues. The firm positions itself as a national-caliber entity with a strong emphasis on partner involvement and business efficiency. Their website reflects a medium-sized firm with consistent branding and professional content aimed at business and individual clients seeking legal counsel. Technically, the website employs modern web standards including HTTPS, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and responsive design elements. While the site performs moderately well and offers good accessibility and SEO features, there is room for improvement in security headers and cookie consent mechanisms to enhance privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS and secure form practices but lacks visible security headers and a formal vulnerability disclosure policy. The absence of WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration legitimacy, although the professional presentation and external references support the firm's credibility. Overall, the site is safe, trustworthy, and suitable for general audiences. Strategically, the firm should address privacy compliance gaps, enhance security headers, and clarify domain registration details to strengthen trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hirschlerlaw.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Hirschler Fleischer operates in the legal services sector, targeting businesses and individuals primarily in Virginia but with national reach. The firm leverages recognized attorneys and community involvement as competitive advantages. Their business model centers on delivering specialized legal counsel with a focus on real estate, immigration, and business law. Revenue streams likely derive from client retainers, litigation, and advisory services. The firm maintains a professional online presence with active social media engagement and client portals, indicating a mature operational structure. Growth indicators include recent attorney recognitions and sponsorships. Partnerships appear limited to related legal entities, with no subsidiaries detected.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with mandatory HTTPS and secure form handling. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or security contact information is published, limiting transparency. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The missing WHOIS data is a notable concern for domain legitimacy and should be investigated. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a professional services website but can be improved to meet higher compliance and trust standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Deploy a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data to ensure domain registration transparency.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools for security and privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hirschler Fleischer
Description
Hirschler is a national-caliber law firm based in Virginia. Invested in clients and their success, attorneys deliver smart solutions to important and often-complex legal issues. The firm emphasizes deliberate service focus, partner involvement, legal excellence, and business efficiency.
Key services
Legal counsel, Litigation, Real estate law, Immigration law, Business law
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Secure forms with autocomplete off
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Constant Contact
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WAF or security challenge detected.
  3. WHOIS data is missing or domain is unregistered in the queried database, which is unusual.
  4. Site uses HTTPS with valid SSL and Google Tag Manager for analytics.
  5. No explicit privacy cookie consent mechanism detected despite privacy policy presence.
  6. Contact information includes multiple office phone numbers and contact forms.
  7. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Twitter, and Facebook.
  8. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, with Google Tag Manager for analytics integration. The site is mobile optimized and accessible with clear navigation and structured content. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. The CMS or hosting provider is not explicitly identified. There is no evidence of modern web frameworks or platforms such as React or WordPress. The site could benefit from enhanced technical SEO and security header implementation. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional user experience but has opportunities for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hirschlerlaw.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hirschlerlaw.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.