Skip to main content

Security report for hiplok.com

Hiplok · Transportation · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hiplok is a specialized e-commerce business focused on providing innovative bike security solutions including locks for bikes, motorbikes, e-bikes, and scooters. The company emphasizes product quality with Sold Secure Insurance Rated locks and offers lifetime warranties, positioning itself as a trusted niche player in the transportation security market. The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with WooCommerce, integrating various marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Klaviyo, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. Technically, the site is well-structured, mobile optimized, and uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, though it lacks some advanced security headers and explicit privacy and terms policies. The domain is long-established since 2009, registered transparently without privacy protection, which supports the legitimacy of the business. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in policy transparency and security headers. The website content is safe for general audiences and professionally presented.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hiplok.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Hiplok operates in the transportation sector, targeting cyclists and motorbike owners seeking high-quality security products. Its business model is direct-to-consumer e-commerce, leveraging online sales channels and digital marketing. The company benefits from strong trust signals such as insurance ratings and warranties, and maintains active social media engagement. The domain age and registration data align with the company's claimed history, enhancing credibility. While no explicit contact information or detailed corporate data is found on the homepage, the brand consistency and product focus suggest a focused small business with potential for growth in the bike security niche.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and has domain transfer protections, but lacks DNSSEC and visible security headers like CSP or HSTS. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, which limits transparency in security management. The presence of multiple third-party scripts increases the attack surface, though no immediate vulnerabilities are detected. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism but no visible privacy policy or terms of service. The security score is moderate, reflecting good baseline protections but missing advanced security practices and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.
  3. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response and data protection officer contacts.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hiplok
Description
Sold Secure Insurance Rated Locks For Bike, Motorbike, E-Bikes & Scooters. Lifetime Warranty on Sold Secure Locks and Bike Storage
Key services
Bike locks, Motorbike locks, E-bike locks, Scooter locks, Bike storage solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Gravity Forms, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare DNS, Doofinder, Facebook Pixel, Klaviyo, Stackable Gutenberg Blocks, Spectra Pro, CookieYes
Frameworks
WordPress, Gutenberg
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Klaviyo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Klaviyo
Marketing tools
Doofinder, Klaviyo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on homepage
  3. Cookie consent mechanism present via CookieYes
  4. Multiple marketing and analytics scripts loaded
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in homepage HTML
  6. Social media links present for Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube
  7. Website built on WordPress with WooCommerce e-commerce platform
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  9. No visible security headers detected in provided data
  10. Domain WHOIS data is transparent and consistent
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce, using modern Gutenberg blocks and several third-party integrations for marketing and search functionality. It uses Cloudflare DNS servers, indicating some level of CDN and DDoS protection. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. The site uses Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing, and CookieYes for cookie consent management. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations such as caching and minification. Accessibility is basic but present, and SEO meta tags are well implemented.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hiplok.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hiplok.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.