Skip to main content

Security report for hillclimb.lv

Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hill Climb Latvija is a well-established motorsport event in Latvia, focusing on hill climb drag races with a large participant base from the Baltic region. The website serves as an informational and ticket sales platform for the 2026 event, showcasing event details, schedule, and thematic elements. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress with the Avada theme and Fusion Builder, integrating modern analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and some security best practices, but lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site is professional and functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hillclimb.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the transportation and motorsport event sector, targeting motorsport enthusiasts and participants primarily in Latvia and neighboring Baltic countries. The event is positioned as a major annual festival with over 250 participants, indicating a niche but active market presence. Revenue streams likely include ticket sales and sponsorships. The partnership with bezrindas.lv for ticketing suggests a collaborative ecosystem. The business model is event-centric with a focus on live experiences and community engagement. Growth indicators include the event's longevity (16th edition) and increasing participant numbers. Strategic observations include the need for improved digital compliance and enhanced trust signals to support expansion.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of security headers likely in place. Integration of third-party analytics and marketing scripts is done asynchronously, reducing performance impact. However, the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies, security.txt, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in compliance and incident response readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, adding security.txt for vulnerability reporting, and enhancing accessibility and security headers to align with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement a security.txt file and a vulnerability disclosure page to facilitate responsible reporting and incident response.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  4. Audit and monitor third-party scripts regularly to mitigate risks from external dependencies.
  5. Consider publishing WHOIS and business registration information on the site to increase transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Hill Climb Latvija is an annual motorsport event in Latvia featuring hill climb drag races with over 250 participants from Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia. The event includes various vehicle classes such as 4x4, motorcycles, quad bikes, and buggies competing for the hill climb king title. The 2026 event is themed 'Amors' and includes a carnival atmosphere with food and entertainment.
Key services
Motorsport event organization, Ticket sales, Entertainment and hospitality at event
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Avada Theme, Fusion Builder, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, GTranslate
Frameworks
Avada Fusion Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel with async loading
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Sendinblue
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress site using Avada theme and Fusion Builder.
  2. Content is focused on a motorsport event in Latvia scheduled for 2026.
  3. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  6. Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and tracking.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
  9. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Avada theme and Fusion Builder, indicating a modern and flexible CMS environment. It uses jQuery and asynchronous loading of analytics scripts such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel, which supports performance optimization. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity and consistent branding. However, no hosting provider information was detected, and no advanced security headers were explicitly found in the HTML. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement in accessibility and SEO through enhanced metadata and structured data. The absence of structured JSON-LD data limits rich search engine results. Overall, the technical setup is solid but could benefit from modernization in compliance and security features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hillclimb.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hillclimb.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.