Skip to main content

Security report for hellenicwarrisks.com

Hellenic War Risks · Transportation · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hellenic War Risks is a specialist mutual war risks insurance provider focused on protecting Greek shipping interests worldwide. The company operates under the umbrella of the Thomas Miller Group, a well-established maritime services provider. Their website presents a professional and comprehensive overview of their services, including detailed coverage information, claims processes, and area-specific risk zones. The target audience primarily consists of Greek ship owners and maritime industry stakeholders seeking specialized war risk insurance solutions. Technically, the website is built on the TYPO3 CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Google reCAPTCHA for security and analytics. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with a moderate performance profile. The presence of a service worker indicates progressive web app capabilities, enhancing user experience. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses reCAPTCHA to protect forms, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear cookie and privacy policies, including consent mechanisms and GDPR adherence. Overall, the website demonstrates a strong business credibility and trustworthy online presence, though the absence of WHOIS registration details introduces some uncertainty. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and providing direct security incident contact information to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Domain Expires Soon

      Domain expires in 28 days

      What to do: Renew domain registration before expiration

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hellenicwarrisks.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
90
Email security
40
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention hellenicwarrisks.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for hellenicwarrisks.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Hellenic War Risks holds a niche position in the maritime insurance sector, specializing in mutual war risks coverage for Greek shipping. Their business model revolves around mutual insurance, pooling risk among members. The company benefits from its association with the Thomas Miller Group, which provides a broad ecosystem of maritime services and partner organizations. The website's content and linked domains reflect a well-established partnership network. Revenue streams likely derive from member premiums and insurance underwriting. The target customers are ship owners and operators requiring specialized war risk insurance. Growth indicators include updated policy documents and active news resources. The company maintains a professional digital presence, supporting its market position and operational transparency.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is solid with mandatory HTTPS encryption and use of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security represents an area for improvement. No direct contact emails or phone numbers were found, and no published incident response or security policy pages exist, which could hinder timely communication during security events. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the analysis. Privacy compliance is strong, with cookie consent and GDPR-aligned privacy policies. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page with clear contact channels for security issues.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance contact information availability, including direct company emails and phone numbers for support and security.
  5. Develop a long-term security strategy incorporating continuous monitoring, employee training, and compliance audits.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hellenic War Risks
Description
The Hellenic War Risks Club protects Greek ships against loss or malicious damage caused by a third party. The ship can be virtually any size or type, and it can be operating anywhere in the world.
Key services
War risks insurance coverage, Claims process support, Policy documentation and circulars, Area-specific coverage (AP Areas)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Service Worker (PWA support)
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Service Worker registered for PWA

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to maritime insurance
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact form present
  4. No explicit security policy or incident response information published
  5. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (TYPO3)
  6. Regulatory compliance statements present
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, a mature and extensible content management system, indicating a stable technical foundation. Integration with Google Analytics and Tag Manager supports data-driven insights, while Google reCAPTCHA protects forms from spam and abuse. The presence of a service worker suggests progressive web app features, improving performance and offline capabilities. The site is mobile responsive and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with compressed CSS and JS assets. No hosting provider details were identified. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and enhance technical documentation for security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hellenicwarrisks.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hellenicwarrisks.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.