Skip to main content

Security report for hectas.com

Vebego Deutschland · Real Estate · Germany

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

37/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Vebego Deutschland is a well-established facility services provider in Germany, offering a broad range of services including building cleaning, industrial cleaning, green care, facility management, and security services. The company positions itself as a reliable and innovative partner focused on enhancing client environments for better performance and quality of life. The website content is professional and well-structured, targeting business clients in need of comprehensive facility services. Technically, the website uses modern marketing and optimization tools such as Google Tag Manager and Visual Website Optimizer, but lacks a valid SSL certificate, which is a critical security shortfall. Security headers are partially implemented, but the absence of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols significantly weakens the security posture. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a privacy policy present, but no cookie consent mechanism is detected, which may pose GDPR compliance risks. Business credibility is supported by multiple certifications and industry memberships, enhancing trust. Overall, the site is functional and professional but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and comply with best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hectas.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
55
Email security
50
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
18
Average
37

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate and facility management sector, serving a large client base across offices, factories, hospitals, and outdoor environments. Its business model focuses on service delivery with a strong emphasis on quality and compliance, as evidenced by certifications like TÜV and DIN standards and memberships in industry associations. The website reflects a mature business with a 28-year-old domain, consistent registration data, and a clear brand presence. Marketing efforts include social media engagement and digital optimization tools. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism and incomplete SSL implementation may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance. The company appears to have a stable market position with a focus on sustainable and inclusive workplace culture.

Security posture

The website's security posture is weak due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and absence of TLS protocols, exposing users to potential data interception risks. While some security headers like HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are present, the overall SSL/TLS configuration is inadequate. No incident response or security policy information is published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The site uses modern marketing scripts but does not appear to expose sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. Immediate remediation is required to install a valid SSL certificate and enable secure protocols to protect user data and improve trustworthiness.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the site.
  2. Implement modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or 1.3) and strong cipher suites for secure communication.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and inform users about tracking.
  4. Publish explicit security and incident response policies including contact channels for security issues.
  5. Conduct regular security audits to identify and remediate vulnerabilities and improve overall security posture.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on a Kestrel web server with an IP address in Europe, likely using a European hosting provider. It employs Google Tag Manager and Visual Website Optimizer for analytics and marketing optimization. The HTML content is well-structured with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data for SEO and social sharing. Performance metrics are missing or zero, indicating potential measurement gaps or slow loading times. Mobile optimization is good, and navigation is clear with a multi-level menu structure. Accessibility features are basic but present. The lack of SSL and modern TLS protocols is a significant technical risk. The site does not appear to use a known CMS or framework explicitly. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional web presence but requires security upgrades and performance monitoring improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hectas.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hectas.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.