Skip to main content

Security report for hazardperception.cz

Transportation · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.hazardperception.cz is an educational platform focused on improving road safety awareness in the Czech Republic through interactive hazard perception video tests and related articles. It is supported by multiple Czech governmental and safety organizations, indicating a strong partnership ecosystem and trustworthiness in its niche. The platform targets drivers and driving license applicants, aiming to enhance their hazard recognition skills to reduce accidents. Technically, the site is built on a modern React and Next.js stack, with good mobile optimization and a clean user experience. However, it lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and security headers, which are areas for improvement. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency but does not detract significantly from the site's legitimacy given its public and governmental backing. Overall, the site presents a professional and trustworthy educational resource with moderate technical and security maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hazardperception.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform occupies a niche in the transportation and government sector, providing hazard perception training videos and articles to Czech drivers. Its business model is educational and awareness-driven, supported by public funds and partnerships with authoritative bodies such as the Ministry of Transport and Police. This partnership network strengthens its market position and credibility. The site does not appear to monetize directly but serves as a public safety tool. Growth potential lies in expanding content and possibly integrating with driver licensing authorities. The lack of direct contact details and privacy policies suggests a focus on content delivery over commercial engagement. The platform's technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage implied but lacks explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options. No forms or inputs collecting sensitive data are present on the homepage, reducing immediate risk exposure. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency in security management. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and providing clear contact channels for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security-related inquiries.
  4. Establish and publicize an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and security posture.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and reach.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website provides interactive hazard perception tests and educational videos focused on road safety in the Czech Republic. It aims to help users recognize and react to common road hazards through video scenarios and articles.
Key services
Interactive hazard perception video tests, Educational articles on road safety, Partnerships with government and safety organizations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Typekit Fonts, JavaScript ES6+
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL scheme)
  • No visible forms collecting sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  4. Content is focused on road safety hazard perception education.
  5. Strong partnership presence with Czech governmental and safety organizations.
  6. Modern React/Next.js technology stack used.
  7. No visible analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  8. No forms collecting personal data on the homepage.
  9. WHOIS data is not publicly available, likely due to privacy protection.
  10. No security headers detected in the provided HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern React and Next.js framework with server-side rendering capabilities, which supports good performance and SEO potential. Fonts are loaded via Adobe Typekit, and video content is delivered through CDN services, indicating a scalable media delivery approach. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the HTML. Performance is moderate, with deferred loading of JavaScript chunks. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and semantic markup. SEO is basic, with minimal meta descriptions and no structured data beyond minimal JSON embedded in the page. Technical risks include lack of security headers and missing compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hazardperception.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hazardperception.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.