Skip to main content

Security report for hausbau.lv

HausBau · Real Estate · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

HausBau is a Latvian small business specializing in private home construction services, offering professional building work including foundations, walls, roofs, and floor heating. The company provides free cost estimation services and targets private homeowners in Latvia. The website is built on WordPress with common plugins and libraries, featuring good SEO and structured data implementation. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. Technically, the site performs moderately well with basic mobile optimization and accessibility. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating room for improvement in privacy compliance. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy for its niche but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hausbau.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention hausbau.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for hausbau.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

HausBau operates in the Latvian real estate construction sector, focusing on private home building. The business model centers on providing construction services with transparent cost estimation, appealing to homeowners seeking reliable and timely building solutions. The website content and testimonials suggest a positive reputation and customer satisfaction. The company appears to be a small local player without visible subsidiaries or parent companies. Marketing and analytics usage is minimal, relying on basic tracking. The absence of terms of service and security policies indicates potential compliance gaps. The business ecosystem is localized with no evident partnerships or extended digital services.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS ensuring encrypted communication, which is a fundamental security measure. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is available, limiting transparency on security governance. The site uses popular WordPress plugins but does not indicate active vulnerability management or security hardening. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers to protect against clickjacking, MIME sniffing, and cross-site scripting.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish security and incident response policies to build trust and demonstrate security governance.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
HausBau
Description
Privātmāju būvniecība piemērotā secībā profesionālu celtniecības speciālistu izpildījumā. Tāmes sastādīšana paredzamajām būvniecības izmaksām BEZMAKSAS 24h.
Key services
Private home construction, Cost estimation, Foundations, Walls, Roofs, Floor heating
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Owl Carousel, Contact Form 7, Quform, Kirki Customizer
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Services
TunT counter
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
TunT counter
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based small business site for private home construction in Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian language with clear business focus.
  3. Contact information including phone and email is provided in header and contact page.
  4. No privacy or cookie consent banner detected despite privacy policy page presence.
  5. No visible security headers detected in HTML source.
  6. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; domain legitimacy cannot be fully verified.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. Uses common WordPress plugins and libraries.
  9. SEO metadata and structured data are well implemented.
  10. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using standard plugins such as Contact Form 7 and Quform for forms, and Owl Carousel for sliders. It uses jQuery and Google Fonts for frontend functionality and styling. The site has valid meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO. Performance is moderate with some optimization opportunities in mobile responsiveness and accessibility. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. No advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies are detected. The site lacks modern security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating technical debt in security and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hausbau.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hausbau.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.