Skip to main content

Security report for hao-56.com

深圳市华美联运国际物流有限公司 · Transportation · China

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.hao-56.com represents Shenzhen Huamei Lianyun International Logistics Co., Ltd., a medium-sized transportation and logistics service provider specializing in cross-border logistics between Shenzhen, Mainland China, and Hong Kong. The company offers a broad range of services including freight transport, moving services, special vehicle transport, customs brokerage, and exhibition logistics. The site is professionally designed with clear navigation and relevant content targeting businesses and individuals requiring logistics solutions in the region. The presence of multiple service descriptions, case studies, and customer statistics indicates a well-established market position. Technically, the website employs a modern tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and Baidu analytics tools, optimized moderately for performance and mobile devices. However, accessibility and security features are basic, with no advanced security headers or anti-CSRF protections detected. Privacy compliance is weak, with no visible privacy or cookie policies, which may pose regulatory risks. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is implied but no explicit security headers or incident response contacts are found. The absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain is a significant concern, reducing trustworthiness despite the professional appearance and business legitimacy suggested by the website content. Overall, the website is functional and business-focused but requires improvements in security best practices, privacy compliance, and domain registration transparency to enhance trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hao-56.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention hao-56.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for hao-56.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector, focusing on cross-border logistics between Shenzhen and Hong Kong. It leverages a service-based business model with diversified offerings including freight, moving, special vehicle transport, and customs services. The target market includes both corporate clients and individual customers needing reliable logistics solutions. The website highlights a customer base of over 13,400 and a team of 67, indicating medium scale operations. Partnerships with multiple logistics-related domains suggest a broad ecosystem. The company emphasizes professional service quality and operational flexibility, positioning itself as a trusted logistics provider in the region. However, the lack of WHOIS transparency and privacy policies may affect customer confidence and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is used, but no explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options are present. Forms collect personal and company data but lack visible anti-CSRF tokens or privacy disclaimers, indicating potential vulnerabilities. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and potential risks. Overall, the site would benefit from enhanced security controls, privacy compliance measures, and transparent domain registration to improve its security posture and trustworthiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Add anti-CSRF tokens to all forms collecting user data and ensure all sensitive forms use POST method.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other data protection regulations.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
  5. Establish and publish incident response contact channels to enhance security transparency and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
深圳市华美联运国际物流有限公司
Description
专业的中港物流、中港货运、中港搬家、中港吨车、散货拼车、一般贸易报关、中港整车 、货运保险业务，拥有独特的经营理念，科学的管理模式，先进的运输装备，优秀的专业团队，灵活的服务方式，为客户提供全方位的优质服务。
Key services
中港物流 (Cross-border logistics), 中港货运 (Freight transport), 中港搬家 (Moving services), 中港吨车 (Ton truck transport), 中港特种车 (Special vehicle transport), 香港进口 (Hong Kong import services), ATA展会运输 (Exhibition logistics), 香港打转 (Hong Kong cargo transit)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, Baidu Analytics, Baidu Share, HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by URL (https://www.hao-56.com/)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Forms use POST method (some forms use GET for search)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Baidu Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Baidu Analytics
Marketing tools
Baidu Share
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Chinese language targeting logistics services between Shenzhen and Hong Kong.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages detected, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  3. Multiple contact forms collect personal and company information but no visible privacy disclaimers or GDPR compliance notices.
  4. No email addresses explicitly listed; contact primarily via phone and QQ instant messaging links.
  5. Website uses Baidu analytics and sharing tools, indicating Chinese market focus.
  6. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations detected in HTML content.
  7. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  8. Website content is professional and relevant to transportation/logistics industry.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard technology stack with jQuery and Bootstrap for UI components, supported by Baidu analytics and sharing tools for user engagement and tracking. The HTML structure is valid and SEO optimized with meta keywords and descriptions relevant to the logistics industry. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site. The site lacks advanced accessibility features and modern security configurations. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could be improved for better security, privacy, and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hao-56.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hao-56.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.