Skip to main content

Security report for hannah.cz

Hannah eshop · Retail · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hannah.cz is a well-established Czech e-commerce retailer specializing in outdoor clothing and equipment. The company operates both online and through 40 physical stores across the Czech Republic, targeting outdoor enthusiasts and active individuals. Their business model focuses on providing high-quality, functional outdoor products with a strong emphasis on customer engagement through a loyalty club and informative blog content. The website is professionally designed with excellent content quality, clear navigation, and mobile optimization, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site leverages modern JavaScript frameworks, including Vue.js, and integrates advanced analytics and error monitoring tools such as Google Tag Manager and Sentry. The platform demonstrates good performance and accessibility standards, although some security headers could be more explicitly implemented. Privacy compliance is robust, with clear privacy and cookie policies and user consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs best practices in error monitoring and consent management. However, it lacks a publicly available security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are recommended for enhanced trust and compliance. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the website's claims, supporting the legitimacy and trustworthiness of the business. Strategically, Hannah.cz should focus on formalizing its security policies and incident response information, enhancing transparency around data retention, and maintaining rigorous third-party script audits to sustain its strong market position and customer trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hannah.cz

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
85
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
88
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Hannah.cz holds a strong market position in the Czech outdoor retail sector, supported by a network of physical stores and a comprehensive online platform. Their competitive advantage lies in product quality, functional design, and customer loyalty programs. The business model is primarily retail-focused, with revenue streams from direct product sales and customer club memberships. Target customers include hikers, travelers, and active lifestyle consumers. The company maintains partnerships with other retail brands like RockPoint and Keen Footwear, enhancing its ecosystem. Growth indicators include active content marketing and multi-language site versions. Operationally, the company demonstrates digital maturity with integrated analytics and user tracking, supporting data-driven decision-making.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Sentry for error monitoring, and comprehensive cookie consent management. Security best practices such as OAuth login options and filtering of error reports indicate a proactive approach. However, the absence of explicit security headers like X-Frame-Options and a public security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy and cookie policies. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file is a gap that could be addressed to improve security culture and stakeholder trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance transparency on data retention policies and communicate them clearly to users.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hannah eshop
Description
Děláme kvalitní outdoor oblečení a vybavení, které je připraveno zvládnout jakýkoliv cíl. Které je vytvořeno s jediným účelem – aby svou funkčností pomohlo všem lidem jako jsme my pokořit každou vytyčenou hranici. Dosáhnout každého cíle.
Key services
Outdoor clothing sales, Outdoor equipment sales, Customer club with discounts, Blog and content marketing
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Sentry, Hooper carousel, Dot.js templating
Frameworks
Vue.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Sentry error monitoring with filtering
  • Cookie consent management with granular consent categories
  • OAuth login options (Facebook, Google, Apple, Seznam)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Seznam
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Sentry
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional e-commerce platform for outdoor clothing and equipment.
  2. Strong presence in Czech Republic with 40 physical stores.
  3. Good privacy and cookie policy implementation with user consent mechanisms.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  5. No signs of malicious content or security blocking.
  6. Social media integration is comprehensive.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern JavaScript stack, likely using Vue.js, with advanced client-side templating and carousel components. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and Facebook Pixel for marketing tracking. Sentry is used for real-time error monitoring with sophisticated filtering to reduce noise. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive images and adaptive layouts. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed and caching strategies. Accessibility features are present but could be further enhanced. The CMS appears custom or based on WPJ.cz platform, supporting multi-language content and e-commerce functionalities. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a robust and scalable e-commerce experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hannah.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hannah.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.