Skip to main content

Security report for handmadekitchens-kent.co.uk

Bakers Kitchen Ltd. · Retail · United Kingdom

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 3 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents Bakers Kitchen Ltd., a small bespoke kitchen company based in Kent, UK, specializing in the design, supply, and installation of custom kitchen furniture. The business targets homeowners and property owners in Kent and surrounding areas, offering a wide range of kitchen styles and materials with bespoke sizing and customization options. The website content is comprehensive regarding business offerings but lacks modern technical and security features. Technically, the site is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, without evidence of a CMS or modern frameworks. Performance and mobile optimization are basic, and SEO practices are minimal. Security posture is weak, with no HTTPS enforcement or security headers detected, and no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR compliance indicators. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain registration issues flagged by Nominet UK, raising concerns about domain legitimacy. Overall, the site provides useful business information but requires significant improvements in security, privacy compliance, and technical modernization.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching handmadekitchens-kent.co.uk

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bakers Kitchen Ltd. operates as a local retail and service provider in the bespoke kitchen market within Kent and South East London. Their competitive advantage lies in offering fully customizable kitchen furniture with a wide variety of materials and door styles at affordable prices. The business model focuses on direct customer engagement through site visits, design services, and installation. The company maintains a modest digital presence with limited marketing tools and no visible social media integration. Growth indicators are not evident from the website. The partnership ecosystem is minimal, with no partner or subsidiary domains identified. Strategic observations suggest the company could benefit from enhanced digital marketing, improved security posture, and clearer compliance documentation to strengthen market trust and customer confidence.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low. The absence of HTTPS and security headers exposes the website and its visitors to potential risks such as data interception and clickjacking. No forms are present to evaluate input validation or secure data handling. Privacy compliance is minimal, with a basic privacy policy but no cookie consent or GDPR-specific disclosures. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not found. The use of Clicky analytics indicates moderate user tracking without clear privacy safeguards. The domain registration issues further complicate trustworthiness. Overall, the security posture requires urgent attention to protect business operations and customer data.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all website traffic.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Develop and deploy a comprehensive cookie policy with a user consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  4. Enhance the privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR compliance and data protection practices.
  5. Investigate and resolve domain registration issues to ensure legitimacy and avoid potential service disruptions.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Bakers Kitchen Ltd.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bakers Kitchen Ltd.
Description
handmade Kitchens Kent are an affordable Quality Kitchen Company that specialises in the supply and installation of Bespoke Furniture within the Kent area, offering a complete service from site visit, Kitchen Design, survey and installation. They provide a large range of kitchen styles including oak, maple, walnut, cherry, ash, pine and painted finishes, with bespoke sizing and door customization.
Key services
Bespoke kitchen furniture supply, Kitchen design service, Kitchen installation, Custom door styles and sizes
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Clicky
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Clicky
Marketing tools
Clicky analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and navigation
  2. No HTTPS or security headers detected in provided HTML
  3. No forms present on homepage to analyze
  4. Privacy policy page exists but quality is basic and no GDPR compliance explicitly stated
  5. No cookie consent mechanism detected
  6. Contact information is clearly provided with phone numbers and physical address
  7. No social media links found
  8. Uses Clicky analytics for visitor tracking
  9. Domain WHOIS data is missing and domain flagged as invalid by registry
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using static HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without modern frameworks or CMS platforms. The design is basic with moderate navigation clarity but lacks mobile responsiveness and accessibility features. Performance is moderate but could be improved with optimization. The absence of HTTPS and security headers indicates technical debt and potential vulnerabilities. No server or hosting provider information is available from the HTML content. The site uses Clicky analytics for visitor tracking but lacks advanced marketing or retargeting tools. Technical modernization including responsive design, CMS adoption, and security enhancements would benefit the business.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with handmadekitchens-kent.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review handmadekitchens-kent.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.