Skip to main content

Security report for haivision.com

Haivision · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Haivision is a recognized leader in the technology sector specializing in low latency video streaming and encoding solutions tailored for broadcasters, enterprises, and government organizations. Their website reflects a mature enterprise with a comprehensive product portfolio including live video contribution, video walls, ISR video solutions, IPTV distribution, and SRT streaming technologies. The company targets professional and mission-critical video networking markets, positioning itself as a key player in real-time video delivery solutions. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor, leveraging modern web technologies and performance optimizations such as NitroPack. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and integrates analytics and marketing tools like Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Invoca. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and secure form implementations, though there is room for improvement in security headers and published security policies. The security evaluation shows a good baseline with no critical vulnerabilities detected in the visible content. However, the absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration transparency, which slightly impacts trustworthiness. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, supporting good privacy compliance. Contact information is clearly presented, enhancing business credibility. Overall, Haivision's digital presence is professional and trustworthy, with recommendations to enhance security headers, publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies, and clarify domain registration details to improve trust and compliance further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching haivision.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
55
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Haivision operates in the technology and media sectors, focusing on video streaming and encoding solutions for high-demand environments such as broadcasting and government. Their business model is B2B, providing hardware and software solutions that enable secure, low latency video transmission. The company demonstrates strong market positioning as a leader in low latency video technology, supported by a broad product range and partnerships such as the SRT Alliance. Revenue streams likely include product sales, rentals, and software licensing. The target customer segments include broadcasters, enterprises, government agencies, and defense sectors. The website content and social media presence indicate a mature enterprise with a global reach and a focus on innovation and mission-critical applications.

Security posture

Haivision's website security posture is good, with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling. The site uses modern technologies and does not expose sensitive data in the HTML content. However, some security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options are not explicitly detected, which could enhance protection against certain attacks. There is no visible security policy or incident response page, nor a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, which are best practices for mature security postures. The lack of WHOIS data reduces transparency and trust. Overall, the site is secure for users but could improve in transparency and advanced security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate XSS and related attacks.
  2. Add X-Content-Type-Options header to prevent MIME sniffing.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program, including a security.txt file.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve trust and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Haivision
Description
Haivision is a leader in low latency video streaming and video encoding solutions for broadcasters, enterprises and government organizations.
Key services
Live video contribution, Video walls, ISR video solutions, IPTV distribution, SRT streaming, Video encoders and decoders, Mobile video transmitters
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Invoca, Elementor, NitroPack, Font Awesome, jQuery
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with proper labels

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Invoca
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Invoca
Marketing tools
Pardot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. No WAF or security blocking detected
  3. WHOIS data missing, indicating possible privacy protection or domain registration anomaly
  4. Comprehensive product and industry information provided
  5. Contact information and social media links are clearly presented
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and appear GDPR compliant
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies found
  8. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimization tools
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Elementor page builder framework, indicating a modern and flexible infrastructure. It integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Invoca, and Pardot, showing a mature digital marketing approach. Performance optimizations are implemented via NitroPack, contributing to fast loading times. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit, but the infrastructure appears robust and enterprise-grade.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with haivision.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review haivision.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.