Skip to main content

Security report for hairfree.lt

hairfree.lt · Retail · Lithuania

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hairfree.lt is an established Lithuanian e-commerce retailer specializing in beauty and health care devices, cosmetology furniture, and massage salon equipment. The company targets professional salons and health care providers across the EU, boasting over 150,000 customers served since 2010. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with multilingual support and a focus on direct manufacturer sourcing to offer competitive pricing and quality products. Technically, the site uses a CMS named Verskis and integrates modern marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, and MailerLite, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, employs standard security headers, and provides a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. However, the absence of WHOIS data and explicit contact information on the site limits full verification of domain legitimacy and business transparency. Overall, the site is well-structured, secure, and privacy-conscious but would benefit from enhanced transparency and published security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hairfree.lt

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention hairfree.lt, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
34
Employees
0
Customers
34
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
12%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for hairfree.lt.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the retail sector focusing on beauty and health care products, serving a niche market of professional salons and massage centers. Its competitive advantage lies in direct sourcing from manufacturers, enabling attractive pricing and quality assurance. The company has a medium-sized market presence in Lithuania and the EU, with a business model centered on e-commerce sales. The website's multilingual capabilities and extensive cookie and privacy compliance indicate a customer-centric approach and readiness for EU regulatory environments. The use of multiple marketing and analytics platforms suggests active customer engagement and data-driven marketing strategies. However, the lack of visible contact details and WHOIS transparency may impact customer trust and regulatory scrutiny.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS, presence of key security headers, and a robust cookie consent mechanism that allows granular user control. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts is extensive but appears managed with consent. Missing are explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are important for comprehensive security governance. The absence of WHOIS data reduces confidence in domain legitimacy, which is a potential risk factor. Overall, the site is secure but could improve transparency and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  2. Add clear and accessible contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve trust and compliance.
  3. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and responsible disclosure.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Investigate and resolve WHOIS data availability issues to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
hairfree.lt
Description
Grožio ir sveikatos priežiūros prietaisai, masažuokliai, kosmetologiniai baldai tiesiai iš gamintojų - aukšta kokybė, patrauklios kainos ir operatyvus pristatymas
Key services
Sale of beauty and health care devices, Cosmetology furniture for salons, Massage salon equipment, Direct manufacturer sourcing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, MailerLite, Voiceflow widget
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Omnisnippet
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google AdSense
Marketing tools
MailerLite, Omnisnippet
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple language support
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with detailed cookie descriptions
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage or in provided HTML snippet
  4. No explicit privacy or security policy pages linked in visible content but privacy policy likely present
  5. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools
  6. No signs of phishing, malware, or adult content
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Verskis CMS platform and uses modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. It integrates several third-party services such as Google Tag Manager for analytics, Cookiebot for cookie consent management, MailerLite for email marketing, and Voiceflow for chatbot functionality. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes SEO best practices such as meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in accessibility features. The technical stack supports a professional e-commerce experience but could benefit from enhanced accessibility compliance and hosting provider transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hairfree.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hairfree.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.