Skip to main content

Security report for hagelschaden-zentrum.de

Hagelschaden-Zentrum Ulm · Transportation · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hagelschaden-Zentrum Ulm is a specialized automotive repair service provider with over 30 years of experience, focusing on hail damage repair, bodywork, paint, autoglass, and vehicle care. The company operates multiple locations across Germany and offers comprehensive services including insurance claim handling, replacement vehicles, and pick-up/drop-off services. Their market position is strong within the regional automotive repair sector, supported by certifications such as ISO 9001 and DEKRA, and partnerships with major insurers. Technically, the website is built on a modern WordPress platform with popular plugins for SEO, testimonials, and cookie consent, hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is partial due to the absence of a visible privacy policy page. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-structured, serving its target audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hagelschaden-zentrum.de

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
80
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention hagelschaden-zentrum.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for hagelschaden-zentrum.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets vehicle owners affected by hail and other damages, providing specialized repair and maintenance services. Their business model revolves around service excellence, insurance partnerships, and customer convenience. The presence of multiple service points and a nationwide footprint indicates a medium-sized enterprise with growth potential. Trust is reinforced by certifications and customer testimonials. The company leverages digital tools for marketing and customer engagement but could enhance transparency with clearer privacy and security policies. Their partnership ecosystem includes insurance companies and automotive product suppliers, strengthening their market position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of cookie consent management. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of incident response contact details represent areas for improvement. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file. Overall, the security measures are adequate for the business type but could be enhanced to meet higher compliance standards and improve incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing GDPR compliance and data handling practices.
  2. Implement and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a security.txt file and provide clear incident response contact information for security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update all WordPress plugins and core to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security assessments to maintain a strong security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Hagelschaden-Zentrum Ulm
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hagelschaden-Zentrum Ulm
Description
Spezialisiertes Hagelschaden-Zentrum mit über 30 Jahren Erfahrung, bietet Reparaturleistungen für Hagelschaden, Karosserie & Lack, Autoglas und Fahrzeugpflege. Deutschlandweit mit mehreren Standorten und Service-Stützpunkten.
Key services
Hagelschaden-Instandsetzung, Karosserie & Lack Reparatur, Unfall-Instandsetzung, Smart Repair, Autoglas Reparatur und Austausch, Fahrzeugpflege, Ersatzfahrzeug und Hol- und Bring-Service
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.4, PHP, jQuery 3.7.1, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution 6.6.20, Indeed My Testimonials plugin, Borlabs Cookie plugin, Sitepress Multilingual CMS (WPML)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security and cookie consent plugins (Borlabs Cookie)
  • No exposed sensitive data detected in HTML
  • Use of reputable plugins and updated WordPress version

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Tag Manager (disabled in current config), Borlabs Cookie for consent management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is comprehensive and focused on automotive repair services.
  3. Multiple physical locations and contact phone numbers provided.
  4. Use of modern WordPress plugins and SEO best practices.
  5. Cookie consent mechanism implemented via Borlabs Cookie.
  6. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  7. Strong trust indicators via certifications and testimonials.
  8. Social media presence across major platforms.
  9. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress 6.7.4 with WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution plugins, hosted on AWS infrastructure. The tech stack includes jQuery and Borlabs Cookie for consent management. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph integration. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The use of multilingual CMS (WPML) indicates a focus on international visitors. No critical technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected, but ongoing maintenance is recommended to keep the platform secure and performant.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hagelschaden-zentrum.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hagelschaden-zentrum.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.