Skip to main content

Security report for gwtr.cz

GW Train Regio a.s. · Transportation · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GW Train Regio a.s. operates regional train services across multiple regions in the Czech Republic, providing transportation solutions with a focus on passenger convenience through online ticket sales and timely operational updates. The company maintains a professional web presence with clear branding, comprehensive contact information, and certifications that enhance trust. Technically, the website employs modern frameworks such as Bootstrap and jQuery, integrates Google services for analytics and security, and implements a robust cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and reCAPTCHA protecting forms, though some HTTP security headers could be improved. Overall, the website is accessible, well-structured, and serves its target audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gwtr.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong position as a regional rail operator in the Czech transportation sector, targeting general public commuters and travelers. Its business model centers on passenger rail services supplemented by digital ticket sales and customer support. Partnerships with payment and ticketing platforms like amsbus.cz indicate a collaborative ecosystem. The presence of certifications and banking partners further supports operational credibility. Growth potential is indicated by multiple regional branches and active career postings. The website content and structure reflect a medium-sized enterprise with consistent branding and professional communication.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS, Google reCAPTCHA integration, and a detailed cookie consent framework supporting user privacy choices. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy and HSTS reduces the overall security score. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. GDPR compliance is well addressed through privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security measures are adequate for the business type but could benefit from additional hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly update all third-party libraries and frameworks to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users, including those with disabilities.
  5. Consider adding terms of service and data protection officer contact details to fully comply with regulatory expectations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
GW Train Regio a.s.
VAT number
CZ28664116
Registration number
28664116
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GW Train Regio a.s.
Description
GW Train Regio a.s. is a transportation company operating regional train services in various regions of the Czech Republic, including Pošumaví, Šumava, R25 Plzeň-Most, Karlovarsko, Ústecko, Královéhradecko, and Moravskoslezsko. The company offers ticket sales, schedules, and operational updates.
Key services
Regional train transportation, Online ticket sales, Customer information and support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4, jQuery 1.12.4, Popper.js, Owl Carousel, Magnific Popup, Bootstrap Datepicker, Nette Framework (live form validation), Google reCAPTCHA v3, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Bootstrap, Nette Framework
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration for forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism with granular controls

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Seznam Sklik
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Czech language
  2. No WHOIS data available, limiting domain trust analysis
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy present
  4. Multiple regional branches and services clearly described
  5. Use of modern web technologies and security best practices
  6. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data
  7. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found
  8. Contact information is complete and consistent
  9. Certifications and partner logos enhance trust
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and widely supported technology stack including Bootstrap 4 for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and various plugins for UI components such as carousels and date pickers. Google Tag Manager and Analytics are used for tracking and marketing insights. The site is moderately performant with no major technical issues detected. Mobile optimization is good, and navigation is clear and user-friendly. The site does not appear to use a CMS, suggesting a custom or framework-based build. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business needs effectively with room for performance and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gwtr.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gwtr.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.