Skip to main content

Security report for gtm4wp.com

Google Tag Manager for WordPress · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Google Tag Manager for WordPress is a specialized technology company providing a WordPress plugin that enables advanced Google Tag Manager integration without requiring coding expertise. The company targets WordPress website owners and developers seeking streamlined tag management solutions. The website demonstrates a strong market position within its niche, supported by professional design, comprehensive content, and consistent branding. Technically, the site leverages WordPress CMS, Cloudflare for DNS and CDN, and integrates modern marketing and analytics tools such as Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics. The site is optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and SEO, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms, though some improvements in DNSSEC and security headers are recommended. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, indicating legitimacy and stability. No critical security or privacy issues were detected, and the site is fully accessible without WAF blocking.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of gtm4wp.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gtm4wp.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the technology sector, focusing on software plugin distribution for WordPress. Its competitive advantage lies in offering no-code Google Tag Manager integration with advanced features, appealing to a broad segment of WordPress users. The business model likely includes free plugin distribution with potential paid upgrades or support services. The company maintains an active social media presence and uses structured data to enhance search visibility. While contact information is limited on the homepage, the presence of a comprehensive privacy and cookie policy indicates compliance maturity. The company appears small-sized, founded around 2016, with no parent or subsidiary companies identified. The website content and technical setup suggest a well-managed operation with a focus on user experience and compliance.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of Cloudflare services for DNS and CDN, enhancing availability and protection. Cookie consent and GDPR compliance are implemented via WebToffee Cookie Consent plugin. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended improvement for DNS security. Security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options are not explicitly detected and should be added to mitigate clickjacking and MIME sniffing risks. Inline scripts with complex lazy loading may pose challenges for strict Content Security Policies. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. Incident response and security policy pages are absent, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is solid but can benefit from incremental enhancements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement additional security headers including X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Simplify or audit inline JavaScript to improve Content Security Policy compliance.
  4. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  5. Enhance visible business contact information to improve trust and credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Google Tag Manager for WordPress
Description
Use Google Tag Manager for WordPress on your WordPress website with advanced features and without the need to code by yourself.
Key services
Google Tag Manager integration for WordPress, Advanced features for tag management, No-code implementation
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare (DNS and CDN), Kadence theme, Rank Math SEO, WebToffee Cookie Consent, Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with GDPR compliance
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Cloudflare for DNS and CDN

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional WordPress plugin site for Google Tag Manager integration.
  2. Uses modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  3. Has GDPR-compliant cookie consent and privacy policy.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on homepage.
  5. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  7. No explicit business contact information visible on homepage.
  8. Strong use of structured data and social media presence.
  9. No WAF or blocking detected; content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Kadence theme and integrates multiple third-party services including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Cloudflare for DNS and CDN. The site uses modern web fonts and lazy loading scripts to optimize performance. SEO is enhanced by Rank Math PRO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. Performance is fast with preconnect and preload hints for critical resources. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, though some inline scripts introduce complexity that could affect security policies. Hosting and DNS via Cloudflare provide resilience and security benefits. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100 +5Medium30 findingsView report
  2. 66/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gtm4wp.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gtm4wp.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.