Skip to main content

Security report for grupojaonline.com.br

Grupo JAonline · Non-profit · Brazil

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, DNS health and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Grupo JAonline operates as a non-profit support group dedicated to helping compulsive gamblers in Brazil through virtual meetings and email support. The organization leverages Microsoft Teams for online meetings and promotes a 12-step recovery program. The website is well-structured, content-rich, and targets individuals and families affected by gambling addiction, particularly those without access to local support groups. Technically, the site is built on the Yola CMS platform, uses jQuery, Google Analytics, and other tracking tools, and is hosted on Brazilian infrastructure consistent with its audience. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA usage, but lacks security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, indicating room for compliance improvements. Overall, the site is trustworthy and serves a niche non-profit community effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching grupojaonline.com.br

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention grupojaonline.com.br, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for grupojaonline.com.br right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization occupies a niche position in the non-profit sector, focusing on gambling addiction recovery support in Brazil. Its competitive advantage lies in providing virtual access to recovery meetings where physical groups are unavailable. The business model is service-oriented without commercial intent, relying on volunteer or community support. The target audience includes compulsive gamblers and their families nationwide. The site shows moderate digital maturity with basic SEO and analytics integration but lacks advanced compliance and security features. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident, and the organization appears small in scale with a focused mission.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap, especially under GDPR or similar regulations. Incident response and security policy information are not provided, limiting transparency. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small non-profit but could benefit from enhancements to align with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to improve compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance site security.
  3. Provide clear incident response and security policy documentation to increase transparency and trust.
  4. Expand contact information to include phone numbers or physical addresses if possible to improve business credibility.
  5. Review and optimize analytics and tracking usage to align with privacy regulations and minimize user tracking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Grupo JAonline
Description
Grupo de Jogadores Anônimos online que realiza reuniões virtuais via Microsoft Teams para ajudar jogadores compulsivos que não têm acesso a grupos presenciais. Oferece suporte por e-mail e promove o programa de recuperação baseado nos 12 passos.
Key services
Online meetings via Microsoft Teams, Email support and communication, Educational material on compulsive gambling and recovery
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA, Quantcast, Snowplow Analytics, Yola CMS platform
Platforms
Microsoft Teams (for meetings)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • No exposed sensitive data found

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Quantcast, Snowplow Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Quantcast, Snowplow
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a non-profit support group for compulsive gamblers in Brazil.
  2. Content is in Brazilian Portuguese and well structured.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. No contact phone numbers or physical addresses found; only email contact is provided.
  5. Uses multiple analytics and tracking services without explicit user consent mechanisms.
  6. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  7. No forms detected that collect personal data directly on the site.
  8. No social media official pages linked except embedded Twitter and Facebook widgets without direct profile links.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Yola CMS platform and uses jQuery 2.2.4 along with Google Analytics, Quantcast, and Snowplow for analytics and tracking. It integrates Google reCAPTCHA for form protection and is hosted on UOL infrastructure in Brazil. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has basic SEO elements such as meta tags and canonical links. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The site does not use modern JavaScript frameworks or advanced frontend technologies, indicating some technical debt but sufficient for its purpose. There is opportunity for modernization and enhanced technical robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with grupojaonline.com.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review grupojaonline.com.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.