Skip to main content

Security report for grupa93.lv

g93 · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

g93 is a Latvian urban design and planning firm specializing in a wide range of services including territorial planning, local and detailed planning, environmental consulting, and public participation. The company targets municipalities, developers, and environmental agencies primarily within Latvia. The website is built on WordPress and employs common plugins for enhanced user experience and team showcasing. It features a professional design with good SEO and mobile optimization but lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance scores. Security posture is generally strong with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers are missing. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site presents a credible small business with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching grupa93.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate and urban planning sector, providing consultancy and design services for public and private sector clients. Its market position appears stable within Latvia, supported by partnerships with local entities such as MadCity and RailBaltica. The business model focuses on service delivery with a strong emphasis on environmental and sustainable urban development. The website content and social media presence indicate active engagement with stakeholders and ongoing projects. However, the absence of detailed business registration or contact information on the site limits full business transparency. Growth potential exists through enhanced digital presence and compliance improvements.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or security policy information is provided, which may hinder rapid response to security events. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which could expose the company to regulatory risks under GDPR. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a small business but would benefit from formalized policies and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with visible links and consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish incident response and security policy documents to demonstrate security governance and readiness.
  4. Include clear company contact emails and phone numbers on the website to improve business credibility and user trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and maintain performance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
g93
Description
Urban design and planning services focusing on territorial planning, local planning, detailed planning, development programs, green infrastructure design, environmental consulting, public participation, mobility studies, and research.
Key services
Territorial planning, Local planning, Detailed planning, Development programs, Green infrastructure planning/design, Environmental consulting, Public participation, Mobility studies, Research
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, Easy Fancybox, Team Showcase plugin, Q2W3 Fixed Widget plugin
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible sensitive data exposure
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is primarily in Latvian with English alternate language available
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found on main page
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on main page or footer
  5. Social media presence is active and linked in footer
  6. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for team showcase and fancybox
  7. No visible forms or data collection fields on main page
  8. SEO metadata and structured data are properly implemented
  9. No security headers detected in provided data
  10. HTTPS is enabled with valid SSL certificates
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.9.10 with a modern but standard tech stack including jQuery, Font Awesome, and Google Fonts. It uses plugins such as Team Showcase and Easy Fancybox for enhanced UI components. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata and structured data (JSON-LD) for improved search engine visibility. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. Accessibility features are basic but could be improved. Hosting provider details are not evident from the data. No advanced frameworks or platforms beyond WordPress are detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small business website but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with grupa93.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review grupa93.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.