Skip to main content

Security report for groupement-lma.fr

Laval Mayenne Aménagements · Real Estate · France

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Laval Mayenne Aménagements (LMA) is a regional real estate and urban development facilitator based in Laval, France. The company supports both public entities and private enterprises in managing and executing real estate and urban planning projects, offering services ranging from project management to assistance in construction and urban services. Their market position is focused on the Mayenne region, with a medium-sized organizational footprint and a professional digital presence. The website reflects a clear business model centered on project facilitation and urban development services, targeting local governments and businesses. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and Matomo Analytics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though performance is moderate. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, reducing trustworthiness from a domain registration perspective. Security-wise, the site shows no immediate vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but improvements are recommended in security headers and incident response disclosures. Privacy compliance is partially met with a comprehensive privacy policy but lacks cookie consent. Overall, the risk level is moderate with recommendations to enhance security and compliance to strengthen trust and regulatory adherence. Strategically, LMA should focus on verifying domain registration legitimacy, implementing cookie consent, and enhancing security headers to improve their digital trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching groupement-lma.fr

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
90
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LMA operates in the real estate and urban development sector, primarily serving public and private clients in the Mayenne region. Their competitive advantage lies in their comprehensive expertise across multiple domains of construction and urban planning, enabling personalized project support. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on project facilitation, assistance to project owners, and urban service management. Revenue streams likely derive from contracts with local governments and private enterprises. The company maintains a professional online presence with active LinkedIn engagement and a portfolio of completed projects, indicating growth and market relevance. Partnerships with local communication agencies suggest a collaborative ecosystem. The absence of WHOIS data is a risk factor that should be addressed to maintain credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security maturity with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. The use of Matomo Analytics suggests a privacy-conscious approach to user tracking, but the absence of a cookie consent mechanism is a compliance gap under GDPR. Regular plugin audits and implementation of security best practices are recommended to mitigate potential vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be significantly improved with targeted measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Verify and update domain WHOIS registration information to ensure legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response plan on the website to demonstrate preparedness and transparency.
  5. Regularly audit WordPress plugins and themes to identify and patch vulnerabilities promptly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Laval Mayenne Aménagements
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Laval Mayenne Aménagements
Description
LMA à Laval (53), accompagne les collectivités et les entreprises dans la réalisation de projets immobiliers et urbains, de la maîtrise d'ouvrage à l'aménagement.
Key services
Immobilier, Aménagement, Gestion locative, Assistance à maîtrise d'ouvrage, Étude conseil, Gestion de services urbains
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Tiny Slider, Swiper, Matomo Analytics, WP Rocket
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress ecosystem)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and requires attention
  3. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected despite GDPR relevance
  4. Use of Matomo analytics indicates privacy-conscious tracking
  5. Contact information is clearly presented and consistent
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; potential improvement area
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using modern plugins such as Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and Matomo for analytics, indicating a focus on SEO and privacy-aware tracking. The front-end uses jQuery, Tiny Slider, and Swiper for interactive elements and sliders, providing a smooth user experience. WP Rocket is used for caching and performance optimization, contributing to moderate loading speeds. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity and professional design. However, accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. The absence of advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates areas for technical improvement. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with groupement-lma.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review groupement-lma.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.