Skip to main content

Security report for groupecarrus.com

Groupe Carrus · Technology · France

Medium risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Groupe Carrus operates as a specialized technology provider and service manager in the pari-mutuel betting and gaming industry, focusing on horse race betting, lottery games, and sports betting services. The company positions itself as a preferred partner for industry leaders and innovators, offering software publishing and technology solutions tailored to betting operators. The website reflects a medium-sized business with a professional digital presence built on WordPress, leveraging SEO and security plugins to enhance visibility and protection. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data introduces uncertainty about domain legitimacy, which should be addressed to strengthen trust. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA implemented, but lacks comprehensive security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences and well-structured for its target market, but improvements in compliance and transparency are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching groupecarrus.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets betting operators and gaming industry stakeholders, providing essential technology and management services for pari-mutuel betting systems. Its business model revolves around software publishing and service provision, positioning itself as a trusted partner in a niche market. The website content and structured data indicate a focus on innovation and partnership with industry leaders. The lack of detailed company registration and contact information limits full business intelligence assessment. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries are linked via the website. The company appears to maintain a moderate market presence with a focus on technology-driven betting solutions.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA, indicating baseline security measures. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces defense-in-depth. No visible vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. The lack of privacy and cookie policies suggests potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced policies, transparency, and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Provide clear contact information including incident response and data protection officer contacts.
  4. Verify and update domain WHOIS registration to ensure legitimacy and transparency.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party plugins and website infrastructure.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Groupe Carrus
Description
Groupe familial spécialisé dans les services et technologies du Pari Mutuel hippique. Provides horse race betting, lottery games, sports betting services, pari-mutuel betting system management, technology provider and software publishing for gaming. Preferred partner of industry leaders and innovators.
Key services
Horse Race Betting, Lottery Games, Sports Betting Services, Pari-mutuel Betting System Management, Technology Provider, Software Publisher
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA, WPBakery Page Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. WHOIS data unavailable or domain not found in registry
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in content
  5. Use of modern WordPress CMS with SEO and security plugins
  6. Content focused on betting technology services with professional presentation
  7. No adult or explicit content detected
  8. Limited security headers and policies exposed
  9. No visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response information
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO and WPBakery Page Builder plugins, indicating a modern and flexible content management approach. Use of Google reCAPTCHA enhances form security. The site is mobile optimized with good SEO meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. Performance is moderate, with no explicit hosting provider identified. Accessibility features are basic but present. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of advanced security headers and policies suggests room for modernization. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but should be enhanced for security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with groupecarrus.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review groupecarrus.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.