Skip to main content

Security report for grenscargo.com

UAB GRENS CARGO · Transportation · Lithuania

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UAB GRENS CARGO is a Lithuanian logistics company specializing in large cargo forwarding services primarily by road transport, coordinating shipments from the European Union to the Baltic states and Russia. The company targets business clients requiring export and freight forwarding services. The website content is basic and primarily in Lithuanian, with limited technical sophistication and dated design. The technical infrastructure includes standard HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and Google Analytics for tracking, hosted on hostex.lt servers. Security posture is weak due to lack of HTTPS enforcement, absence of security headers, and no visible privacy or cookie policies, which also impacts GDPR compliance. Contact information is clearly provided, but no incident response or security contact channels are present. Overall, the website reflects a small-sized company with moderate trustworthiness but requires significant improvements in security and privacy compliance to meet modern standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching grenscargo.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention grenscargo.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for grenscargo.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector with a focus on freight forwarding and logistics services. It has a stable domain registration since 2009, consistent with its business age. The business model is B2B, serving foreign companies with export needs. The company has invested in integrated business management systems to optimize operations, indicating a focus on efficiency and competitiveness. However, the website lacks modern features and comprehensive policy disclosures, which may affect customer trust and regulatory compliance. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated on the website or WHOIS data.

Security posture

The security maturity level is low to moderate. The absence of HTTPS and security headers exposes the site to potential interception and clickjacking risks. No forms are present, reducing attack surface, but also limiting user engagement. The use of Google Analytics without cookie consent mechanisms indicates privacy compliance gaps under GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness for security events. The domain registration is stable and legitimate, but DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a minor security shortfall.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  4. Establish and publish a security incident response contact email (e.g., security@ or abuse@) to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Modernize website design with mobile responsiveness and accessibility improvements to enhance user experience and SEO.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
UAB GRENS CARGO
VAT number
LT100003099412
Registration number
300660237
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UAB GRENS CARGO
Description
UAB GRENS CARGO provides large cargo forwarding services by road transport. The company coordinates cargo flows from the European Union to the Baltic countries and Russia. Most clients are foreign companies with export as a major part of sales. The company has implemented an integrated business management system to optimize internal and external business processes, improving productivity and competitiveness.
Key services
Road transport, Air transport, Containers, Warehouses and terminals, Other logistics services
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is in Lithuanian with some English and Russian language options.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  4. No forms detected on the site, limiting data collection risks.
  5. Use of Google Analytics for tracking without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  6. Website design is dated and not mobile optimized.
  7. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement detected in provided data.
  8. WHOIS data shows domain is registered since 2009 with Tucows Domains Inc.
  9. No social media links or security incident contacts found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript technologies with Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The hosting provider is hostex.lt, with domain registration managed by Tucows Domains Inc. The site lacks modern CMS or frameworks and shows signs of aging design and limited mobile optimization. Performance is moderate but could be improved with updated technologies and optimization. No CMS or advanced platforms detected. No forms or interactive elements reduce complexity but also limit functionality. SEO and accessibility are basic, with minimal meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags present.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with grenscargo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review grenscargo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.