Skip to main content

Security report for greenyard.com

GREENYARD a.s. · Real Estate · Slovakia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GREENYARD a.s. is a Slovakian real estate company specializing in rental spaces, primarily commercial properties in Žilina. The website serves as a portal showcasing available rental locations with image galleries and contact information. The business model focuses on property rental and management targeting local businesses or individuals seeking commercial spaces. The company maintains a modest online presence with basic branding and limited content depth. Technically, the website uses common web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Font Awesome, with Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site is mobile responsive and moderately optimized but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No CMS or hosting provider details are evident. Security measures are minimal with no visible security headers or privacy policies, and the WHOIS data is missing, which raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks important security headers and privacy compliance indicators. No forms or sensitive data collection points are present, reducing immediate risk. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies and missing WHOIS data reduce trustworthiness. Overall, the site is functional but requires improvements in security posture and compliance. The overall risk is moderate due to missing WHOIS data and lack of privacy compliance. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, verifying domain registration, and adding incident response contacts to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching greenyard.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GREENYARD operates in the real estate rental sector in Slovakia, focusing on commercial spaces. The company appears to be a small local player with a straightforward business model centered on leasing properties. The website targets local businesses and individuals in need of rental spaces. The presence of Facebook as a social media channel indicates some engagement with customers. The lack of detailed business information such as founding year or parent company limits deeper analysis. The company does not appear to have subsidiaries or a broad partnership ecosystem based on available data. Revenue streams are likely rental income. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not evident from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating poor GDPR compliance. The absence of incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests limited preparedness for security incidents. No forms or user input fields reduce attack surface but also limit user engagement. The missing WHOIS registration data is a significant red flag for domain legitimacy. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate with room for significant improvement in compliance and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure legitimacy and transparency.
  4. Add an incident response contact or security email address to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident handling.
  5. Enhance website accessibility and SEO features to improve user experience and search engine ranking.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
GREENYARD a.s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GREENYARD a.s.
Description
Priestory na prenájom (Spaces for rent) - The company offers rental spaces, likely commercial or office real estate in Žilina, Slovakia.
Key services
Rental of commercial spaces, Property management
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Lightview, jQuery UI, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by og:url https://www.greenyard.com/)
  • No visible forms collecting sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. Content is minimal and focused on real estate rental in Slovakia.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on main page.
  4. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, raising legitimacy concerns.
  5. Basic use of modern web technologies but lacks advanced security headers.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided in footer.
  7. No forms detected on main page for data collection.
  8. Google Analytics is used for tracking.
  9. No visible certifications or security policies.
  10. Website language is Slovak with option for English language toggle.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional web stack with jQuery, Bootstrap, and Font Awesome for UI components and styling. Google Analytics is integrated for visitor tracking. The site is mobile responsive and uses carousels for image display. No modern CMS or SPA frameworks detected. Performance appears moderate with no explicit optimization techniques visible. The site lacks advanced accessibility features and SEO meta tags are minimal. No visible hosting or CDN information is available. The absence of security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and compliance domains. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but dated and requires modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with greenyard.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review greenyard.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.