Skip to main content

Security report for greenway.lv

Greenway Group SIA · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Greenway Group SIA operates a specialized truck and heavy vehicle service center located in Jelgava, Latvia. The company focuses on diagnostics, maintenance, and repair services for commercial vehicles, targeting local businesses and individual truck owners. Their market position is that of a trusted local service provider emphasizing quality, customer care, and operational efficiency. The website content supports this with detailed service descriptions, customer testimonials, and contact information. Technically, the website is built on the Mozello CMS platform, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and cloud-based CDN hosting for performance. Analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Facebook Pixel are integrated with a cookie consent mechanism, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and client-side form validation; however, the absence of HTTP security headers and lack of published security policies suggest room for improvement. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy image with good content quality and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching greenway.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Greenway Group SIA serves the transportation sector with a focus on truck servicing in Jelgava, Latvia. Their business model is service-oriented, providing diagnostics, repairs, and roadside assistance. The company leverages local market knowledge and customer-centric practices such as free transport for clients and detailed service histories. Their partnership with kraviniekiem.lv indicates a complementary business relationship in truck accessories retail. The website's testimonials and portfolio links suggest a growing and reputable presence. Revenue streams likely derive from service fees and possibly accessory sales through partners. The company targets commercial vehicle operators and logistics companies, positioning itself as a reliable local service hub. Growth indicators include active marketing and customer engagement via social media and digital channels.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, reflecting compliance with basic privacy regulations. The use of reputable analytics and marketing scripts is balanced with client-side validation on forms. However, the lack of HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could hinder rapid response to security events. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. To enhance security, the company should implement security headers, publish security policies, and consider a security.txt file for vulnerability reporting. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small service business but could be improved to meet higher compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are in use.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and providing clearer cookie management options.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Greenway Group SIA
VAT number
LV40203264563
Registration number
40203264563
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Greenway Group SIA
Description
Kravas auto serviss Jelgavā, Smago auto un kravas busu diagnostika, apkopes un remonts. Uztici sava uzņēmuma autoparku mūsu speciālistiem!
Key services
Truck and heavy vehicle diagnostics, Maintenance and repair, Roadside assistance, Solar panel systems
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Mozello CMS scripts
Platforms
Mozello CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of secure analytics scripts
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • Form validation on client side

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.
  2. Uses modern analytics and marketing tools with cookie consent implemented.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple channels.
  4. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error, limiting domain trust verification.
  5. No visible security headers detected; HTTPS is enforced.
  6. No explicit privacy or security policies beyond basic privacy policy found.
  7. No terms of service or incident response information found.
  8. Business appears to be a small local service provider in transportation sector.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Mozello CMS and uses a combination of jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, and custom Mozello scripts. Hosting is via Amazon CloudFront CDN, which supports performance and availability. Analytics tools include Google Analytics (gtag.js), Microsoft Clarity, and Facebook Pixel, integrated with cookie consent mechanisms. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by meta tags and canonical links. Performance is moderate, with deferred loading of scripts and image lazy loading. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of HTTP security headers and limited server security configuration details suggest areas for modernization and risk reduction.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with greenway.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review greenway.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.