Skip to main content

Security report for greenpeace.pt

Greenpeace Portugal · Non-profit · Portugal

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Greenpeace Portugal is the local branch of the globally recognized environmental NGO Greenpeace International. The organization focuses on environmental activism, campaigns against climate change, ocean protection, and promoting sustainable socio-economic models. Their website serves as a platform for information dissemination, volunteer recruitment, and donation collection, targeting the general public and environmental supporters in Portugal. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like Bootstrap and integrates analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager and HubSpot. The website is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and includes comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers and incident response information could be improved. Overall, Greenpeace Portugal's digital presence is professional, trustworthy, and aligned with their mission.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching greenpeace.pt

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
80
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention greenpeace.pt, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for greenpeace.pt right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Greenpeace Portugal operates as a non-profit entity under the umbrella of Greenpeace International, leveraging a global brand and network. Their business model relies on donations and volunteer support, with clear calls to action for joining campaigns and signing petitions. The website reflects a medium-sized organization with a consistent brand identity and a focus on transparency and community engagement. The presence of multiple social media channels and integration with marketing tools indicates a mature digital strategy. No direct revenue streams beyond donations are evident, consistent with NGO operations. The organization maintains a strong market position in environmental advocacy within Portugal, supported by global recognition.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data in the HTML. Cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR requirements, and privacy policies are comprehensive. However, the absence of explicit security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) and lack of published security or incident response policies represent areas for improvement. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files were found, which could enhance transparency and trust. The use of third-party scripts like HubSpot and Google Tag Manager is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened with additional best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Greenpeace Portugal
Description
A Greenpeace é um movimento global com mais de 3 milhões de pessoas em 55 países, que atuam para pôr fim aos abusos contra o meio ambiente.
Key services
Environmental campaigns, Petitions, Donations, Volunteer recruitment, Information dissemination
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Bootstrap 4.6, jQuery, Plyr video player, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot forms
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot
Marketing tools
HubSpot forms, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Strong focus on environmental activism and community engagement.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress).
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  6. No explicit terms of service found.
  7. Multiple social media channels linked and active.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. Good SEO and metadata implementation.
  10. Newsletter form collects personal data with privacy consent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Bootstrap 4.6 for responsive design and jQuery for scripting. It integrates Plyr for video embedding and uses Google Tag Manager and HubSpot for analytics and marketing automation. The site loads CSS asynchronously for performance optimization and includes a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. The design is modern and mobile-friendly, with good SEO metadata and Open Graph tags for social sharing. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in accessibility and security header implementation. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the organization's digital goals effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with greenpeace.pt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review greenpeace.pt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.