Skip to main content

Security report for greencarrier.lv

Greencarrier · Transportation · Sweden

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Greencarrier is a well-established logistics company specializing in sea freight and sustainable shipping solutions with over 30 years of experience. The company operates primarily in the Nordic and Baltic regions, Poland, Germany, and Singapore, offering services such as Full Container Load (FCL) and Less than Container Load (LCL) shipping. Their website reflects a professional and modern digital presence, leveraging WordPress and Elementor for content management and design, complemented by SEO and anti-spam technologies. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and anti-spam measures, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is strong with clear privacy and cookie policies and GDPR adherence. Overall, the website and domain registration data indicate a legitimate and credible business with a focus on sustainability and customer service.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching greencarrier.lv

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
30
Email security
82
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
88
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Greencarrier holds a strong market position as a medium-sized transportation company with a family-oriented culture and entrepreneurial spirit. Their business model focuses on providing efficient sea freight logistics with an emphasis on reducing environmental impact. The company targets businesses requiring shipping solutions, offering tailored services for full and partial container shipments. Their sustainability initiatives and strategic partnerships enhance their competitive advantage. The presence of subsidiary domains dedicated to specific service lines indicates a structured and diversified service offering. Growth indicators include recent news and career stories, reflecting active business development and market engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and anti-spam protection on forms. However, the absence of certain security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options suggests room for enhancement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts such as Google Tag Manager and CleanTalk is managed appropriately, but continuous monitoring is recommended. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly disclosed, which is common but could be improved to enhance trust. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from additional hardening measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options HTTP headers to improve security against XSS and MIME sniffing attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Consider adding terms of service and vulnerability disclosure policies to complete compliance and governance documentation.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Greencarrier
Description
With over 30 years of global shipping experience, and a service-oriented staff, we are here to assist you with high-quality sea freight services.
Key services
Full Container Load (FCL) shipping, Less than Container Load (LCL) shipping, Sustainable logistics solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, CleanTalk Anti-Spam
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Anti-spam protection on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
CleanTalk pixel
Marketing tools
LinkedIn Insight Tag
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. Strong focus on sustainability and logistics services
  3. Clear contact information and multiple communication channels
  4. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  5. No signs of blocking or WAF interference
  6. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security issues
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for page building and Yoast SEO for optimization. It employs jQuery and integrates Google Tag Manager and CleanTalk for analytics and anti-spam functionality. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by video backgrounds and image assets. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit but DNS servers indicate a stable infrastructure. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and security headers to align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with greencarrier.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review greencarrier.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.