Skip to main content

Security report for greater.lv

Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website greater.lv represents a Latvian small business specializing in outdoor advertising services including vehicle wrapping, facade decoration, light boxes, and banners. The company targets local businesses and organizations seeking professional advertising solutions. The site is well-structured with clear navigation and good content quality, including galleries showcasing their work and a contact form for inquiries. Social media presence is established across Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and WhatsApp, enhancing customer engagement. Technically, the website employs common web technologies such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Font Awesome, and Google Fonts. The site appears mobile-optimized and moderately performant. However, there is no explicit evidence of advanced CMS or hosting details. Security posture is moderate; while cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, no security headers or HTTPS enforcement details were found in the provided data, indicating room for improvement. From a security and compliance perspective, the absence of a privacy policy and terms of service pages is a notable gap, especially given the use of tracking and marketing scripts. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. No adult or questionable content is present, and the site is safe for general audiences. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security measures, privacy compliance documentation, and WHOIS transparency to improve trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching greater.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Greater.lv operates as a local advertising service provider in Latvia, focusing on vehicle and facade advertising solutions. Their business model revolves around design, production, and installation services for outdoor advertising. The company leverages social media channels for marketing and customer interaction. The lack of detailed company registration or founding year information limits deeper business intelligence. The website content and service offerings suggest a small-sized enterprise targeting SMEs and local businesses. The presence of Google Ads and analytics indicates active digital marketing efforts. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with cookie consent implemented, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of detected security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security robustness. The use of multiple third-party scripts increases the attack surface and necessitates regular security audits. The lack of privacy policy and terms of service pages is a compliance gap under GDPR. WHOIS data unavailability restricts domain trust verification. No immediate vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found, but improvements in HTTPS enforcement and security headers are recommended to mitigate risks.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with HSTS to secure all website traffic.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize vulnerabilities.
  5. Obtain and publish WHOIS domain registration details to improve transparency and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Provides design and production services for vehicle stickers, facade decorations, light boxes, banners, and other outdoor advertising solutions primarily in Latvia.
Key services
Vehicle wrapping and sticker design, Facade decoration and signage, Light boxes and banners production, Design visualization and project approval assistance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Font Awesome, Google Fonts (Fira Sans), JavaScript, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (AW-638817913)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and images.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. Cookie consent banner present with user choice for cookie categories.
  4. Contact information includes email, phone, and contact form.
  5. Multiple social media profiles linked (Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, WhatsApp).
  6. No privacy policy or terms of service pages detected.
  7. No explicit security headers or HTTPS enforcement details found in provided data.
  8. Website uses multiple Google tracking and marketing scripts.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; content is business and service focused.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard modern tech stack with Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Font Awesome icons, and Google Fonts for typography. The HTML structure is valid and includes responsive design elements for mobile optimization. Performance is moderate, with multiple external scripts that could impact load times. No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and semantic markup. SEO optimization is basic, with meta tags and Open Graph tags present but no structured data like JSON-LD detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with greater.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review greater.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.