Skip to main content

Security report for graphene-theme.com

Graphene Themes Solutions · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Graphene Themes Solutions is a small technology company specializing in the development and support of WordPress themes, notably the Graphene theme family. With over 1.5 million downloads and a strong community presence, they offer both free and premium themes alongside custom website development services. Their market position is that of a reputable and established WordPress theme provider with a loyal user base. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce integration, leveraging modern web technologies and third-party analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices, although some accessibility features could be improved. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, but lacks important security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain is a notable anomaly that impacts trustworthiness. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front for its business, but improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and domain registration transparency are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching graphene-theme.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Graphene Themes Solutions operates in the WordPress theme development sector, targeting website developers and businesses seeking customizable themes. Their business model includes offering free themes to build community goodwill and premium upgrades for revenue. The company maintains an active support forum and developer blog, fostering user engagement and support. Partnerships with payment processors like PayPal and design firms enhance their service offerings. The company appears to be small but well-established since 2010, with a consistent brand and positive user testimonials indicating a strong market position within the WordPress ecosystem.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate spam and abuse. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is basic, with no visible cookie consent banner despite tracking technologies in use. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a significant concern that should be investigated to ensure domain legitimacy and prevent potential spoofing or hijacking risks.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add an explicit cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations, especially given the use of tracking and marketing scripts.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and provide dedicated incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and ensure compatibility.
  5. Verify and update domain WHOIS registration information to ensure legitimacy and build trust with users.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Graphene Themes Solutions
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Graphene Themes Solutions
Description
Makers of beautifully-crafted and functionally-perfect WordPress themes, sites, and plugins.
Key services
WordPress theme development, Custom website and web application development, Support forum and community engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Google reCAPTCHA, jQuery, WebFont Loader
Frameworks
WooCommerce
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics with consent defaults

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
AddThis
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
AddThis
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based theme provider with a focus on Graphene themes.
  2. Content is rich with testimonials, developer info, and active blog posts.
  3. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via form.
  4. No explicit cookie consent banner detected despite use of tracking scripts.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which is a significant anomaly.
  6. Security headers are not explicitly present; HTTPS is enforced.
  7. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
  9. Website is professionally designed and well maintained.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities. It uses a combination of modern JavaScript libraries and third-party services including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Google reCAPTCHA. The site loads CSS and JS assets efficiently with minification and caching. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO metadata is well implemented with Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. However, the site lacks advanced accessibility features and some security best practices such as security headers. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in load speed and resource optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with graphene-theme.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review graphene-theme.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.