Skip to main content

Security report for graart.it

Anas · Transportation · Italy

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GRAArt is a government-sponsored cultural project by Anas, focusing on urban street art in Rome, particularly murals on the Grande Raccordo Anulare. The website serves as a platform to showcase these artworks and promote cultural heritage, targeting a general audience interested in contemporary urban art and local history. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins like Yoast SEO and Slider Revolution, providing a good user experience and mobile optimization. However, the WordPress version is outdated, which poses security risks. The site uses HTTPS and has a cookie consent mechanism, but lacks explicit privacy and terms of service pages. Social media integration is present and consistent with the project's branding. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally presented but would benefit from security and compliance improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching graart.it

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention graart.it, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for graart.it right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The project operates in the transportation and government cultural sectors, leveraging public funding and partnerships with cultural institutions like MIBACT. Its niche focus on urban art and cultural storytelling positions it uniquely in the market, appealing to both locals and tourists interested in Rome's heritage. The business model is non-commercial, emphasizing cultural promotion rather than direct revenue. The partnership ecosystem includes social media platforms and governmental bodies, enhancing credibility and outreach. Growth potential lies in expanding digital engagement and possibly integrating interactive maps or augmented reality features.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of security-related plugins. However, the outdated WordPress core version is a significant vulnerability that could expose the site to exploits. No advanced security headers were detected, and there is no visible incident response or security policy information. The cookie consent mechanism aligns with GDPR requirements, but the absence of a privacy policy and terms of service indicates compliance gaps. Incident response readiness appears minimal, with no dedicated security contact channels. Overall, the site requires updates and enhanced security controls to mitigate risks effectively.

Recommendations

  1. Update WordPress core and all plugins to the latest versions to address security vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  4. Establish and publicize an incident response policy and security contact information.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Anas
Description
GRAArt is a contemporary urban art project sponsored by Anas and patronized by MIBACT, curated by MURo, showcasing street art murals on the walls of the Grande Raccordo Anulare in Rome, highlighting cultural richness and local myths.
Key services
Urban art exhibitions, Cultural promotion, Public art installations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 4.7.29, Yoast SEO plugin, Slider Revolution, Visual Composer, jQuery, Google Fonts, Bootstrap, Font Awesome
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress ecosystem)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo (ingestion.webanalytics.italia.it), OneTrust (cdn-ukwest.onetrust.com)
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Social Pug
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a cultural project sponsored by a government entity (Anas).
  2. Uses WordPress with common plugins for SEO and content management.
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via OneTrust.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected.
  6. Contact information is primarily via a contact page form; no direct emails or phone numbers found in the main content.
  7. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL certificates.
  8. WordPress version is outdated, posing potential security risks.
  9. Social media presence is linked and consistent with the project.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a mature WordPress-based infrastructure with popular plugins for SEO, page building, and sliders. The tech stack includes jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, and Google Fonts, providing a modern and responsive design. Performance is moderate, with some potential for optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site integrates Matomo analytics and OneTrust for cookie consent, indicating attention to privacy and data tracking. However, the outdated WordPress version and lack of advanced security headers represent technical debt and risk. Hosting details are not explicit, but the presence of Italian web analytics and domain registration suggests local hosting or CDN usage. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals but requires modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with graart.it. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review graart.it.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.