Skip to main content

Security report for gpswox.com

GPSWOX · Transportation · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GPSWOX is a global provider of GPS tracking software and white label GPS server solutions, serving over 100,000 clients worldwide. Their offerings include fleet tracking, personal tracking, and a GPS trackers shop, supported by mobile applications for iOS and Android. The company positions itself as a market leader with a strong emphasis on ease of use, compatibility with over 900 GPS devices, and comprehensive customer support. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Klaviyo for marketing and analytics, hosted on Amazon CloudFront CDN, and uses PyroCMS as the content management system. Security-wise, GPSWOX demonstrates good practices with HTTPS enforcement, use of Google reCAPTCHA, and holds ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certification, indicating a mature security posture. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain registration transparency, which slightly impacts trustworthiness. Overall, the website is professional, well-structured, and compliant with privacy regulations, making it a credible platform for GPS tracking services.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gpswox.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GPSWOX operates a SaaS and white label business model targeting transportation and personal tracking markets globally. Their competitive advantage lies in broad device compatibility, white label customization, and strong customer support. The company leverages partnerships with GPS device manufacturers and maintains a global customer base across 123 countries. Revenue streams include software subscriptions, white label licensing, and hardware sales. The presence of extensive testimonials and ISO certification supports their market credibility. The company is medium-sized, founded in 2014, and headquartered in the UK with development in Lithuania. Their marketing ecosystem includes affiliate programs and advanced analytics, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy.

Security posture

GPSWOX exhibits a strong security posture with HTTPS enforced across the site, use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms to prevent abuse, and an ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certification demonstrating adherence to international information security standards. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options were not found in the HTML content, which could be improved. Incident response contact details and a vulnerability disclosure policy are not publicly available, representing a gap in transparency. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from enhanced header policies and published security procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information for security issues to enhance trust and readiness.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS registration data to improve domain registration transparency and trustworthiness.
  5. Continue regular security audits and maintain ISO certification to uphold high security standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GPSWOX
Description
GPSWOX provides GPS tracking software and white label GPS server solutions compatible with 900+ GPS trackers. They offer fleet tracking, personal tracking, and white label software for businesses to start their own GPS tracking services.
Key services
White label GPS tracking software, Fleet tracking software, Personal tracking accounts, GPS trackers shop, Mobile tracking apps
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Klaviyo, PostAffiliatePro, reCAPTCHA
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security certifications (ISO 27001)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Klaviyo
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Klaviyo
Marketing tools
Klaviyo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong presence of customer testimonials and global client references.
  3. Use of multiple modern analytics and marketing tools.
  4. Security certifications prominently displayed (ISO 27001).
  5. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual and warrants caution.
  6. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  7. Multiple contact channels including emails, phone, and forms.
  8. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  9. No evidence of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Klaviyo, and PostAffiliatePro for marketing and analytics. It is hosted on Amazon CloudFront CDN ensuring fast content delivery. The CMS appears to be PyroCMS, indicated by the system path. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. SEO is well implemented with proper meta tags, canonical URLs, and structured data in JSON-LD format. Performance is fast with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of CDNs. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and publish additional security documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gpswox.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gpswox.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.