Skip to main content

Security report for gpsgate.com

GpsGate AB · Transportation · Sweden

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GpsGate AB operates a well-established fleet management platform specializing in GPS vehicle tracking and customizable fleet solutions. The company targets fleet operators and GPS tracking businesses globally, offering a SaaS model with pay-per-device pricing and professional services. Their market position is strong, supported by a history since 2007 and partnerships with notable clients such as airports and logistics firms. The website reflects a mature digital presence with excellent content quality, clear navigation, and mobile optimization. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies including React and Next.js, hosted on a cloud platform with a Prismic CMS backend. Performance and SEO are well-optimized, and accessibility is good. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and minimal tracking, though some security best practices like explicit security policies and incident response contacts are missing. Overall, the website demonstrates high professionalism and trustworthiness, with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies aligned with GDPR. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious elements were detected. Strategic recommendations include adding terms of service, security policies, and vulnerability disclosure information to enhance transparency and compliance further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gpsgate.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GpsGate AB holds a competitive position in the transportation technology sector, focusing on fleet management solutions. Their business model centers on SaaS offerings with flexible pricing and professional services, targeting fleet operators and developers needing customizable GPS tracking solutions. The company shows growth through global partnerships and diverse customer use cases. Their digital ecosystem includes developer documentation, support portals, and career opportunities, indicating a mature operational structure. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled communication channels via web forms and support portals.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and a cookie policy restricting usage to essential cookies only, minimizing privacy risks. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Security headers were not explicitly identified in the HTML content, suggesting potential enhancements. Overall, the security risk is low but could be further mitigated by adopting industry best practices and publishing relevant security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security frameworks and practices.
  2. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Include incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Create and publish a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and liabilities.
  5. Implement additional HTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen defenses.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GpsGate AB
Description
GpsGate provides a fleet management platform offering GPS vehicle tracking essentials and a customizable platform to collect fleet data to grow businesses.
Key services
Real-time GPS tracking, Custom fleet solutions development, Professional onboarding and support, Mobile fleet management app, GPS signal splitter
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google Fonts, Material Icons, Prismic CMS
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Cloud hosting (likely AWS or similar CDN), Prismic CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No tracking or marketing cookies used
  • Cookie consent banner with essential cookies only

Analytics and tracking

Services
Custom event tracking script
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
excellent

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and mobile optimization.
  2. Content is rich, relevant, and well-structured for target audience.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. No exposed sensitive data or security vulnerabilities detected.
  5. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found.
  6. Contact information is available via contact form but no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  7. No public vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts.
  8. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (Prismic).
  9. No advertising or tracking beyond essential cookies and minimal event tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React/Next.js stack with Prismic CMS integration, ensuring dynamic content management and fast performance. The use of Google Fonts and Material Icons enhances UI consistency. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected. Hosting appears to be via a CDN or cloud provider, contributing to fast load times. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and expand accessibility features. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a robust and scalable digital presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gpsgate.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gpsgate.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.