Skip to main content

Security report for gpschile.com

GPS Chile · Transportation · Chile

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GPS Chile operates as a specialized provider of fleet management solutions, offering a platform that enables businesses to optimize their vehicle fleets through GPS tracking, cost control, and productivity enhancement. The company targets businesses in Chile requiring efficient fleet oversight and positions itself as a leader in this niche market. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with a professional digital presence, leveraging modern web technologies and multiple analytics tools to monitor user engagement and marketing effectiveness. However, the absence of publicly available WHOIS data introduces some uncertainty regarding domain ownership legitimacy. The site is well-structured with good SEO practices but lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for compliance with data protection regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gpschile.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
40
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company focuses on B2B SaaS offerings in the transportation sector, providing GPS tracking and fleet management services. Its market positioning is strengthened by active social media channels and a professional website. The business model likely includes subscription-based revenue streams from platform users. The use of advanced analytics and marketing tools indicates a data-driven approach to customer acquisition and retention. However, the lack of explicit contact information and compliance documentation may hinder trust-building with potential clients. The company appears to be independent with no parent or subsidiary relationships disclosed.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses asynchronous loading of tracking scripts, which is positive for security and performance. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. The extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts increases the attack surface and requires regular security audits. The absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure program suggests limited transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with better header configurations and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to ensure GDPR and local data protection compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
  3. Verify and publish domain WHOIS information or use a trusted registrar to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
  4. Establish and communicate a security policy and incident response process, including dedicated contact channels for security issues.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and minimize tracking to reduce privacy risks and improve user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GPS Chile
Description
Optimiza tu flota con nuestra plataforma líder en seguimiento y gestión. Controla costes, eleva la eficiencia y maximiza la productividad. ¡Únete hoy!
Key services
Fleet tracking, Cost control, Efficiency improvement, Productivity maximization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Astra Theme, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Zendesk Widget
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and analytics scripts loaded asynchronously
  • Use of Facebook Pixel and other tracking scripts with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Mixpanel, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, Mixpanel, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Mixpanel, Zendesk
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which reduces trustworthiness.
  3. Website uses multiple third-party analytics and tracking tools extensively.
  4. No visible privacy or cookie policy found, indicating compliance gaps.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the content provided.
  6. Website content is professional and targeted at fleet management businesses in Chile.
  7. Good use of SEO metadata and structured data for organization and webpage.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data; SSL is enabled and appears well configured.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy information found.
  10. Social media presence is strong with official Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and YouTube links.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, indicating a modern and flexible CMS infrastructure. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Mixpanel, Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, and LinkedIn Insight Tag, reflecting a mature digital marketing strategy. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and responsive design for mobile devices. SEO is well addressed with Yoast SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format. However, the lack of detected security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the data provided.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gpschile.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gpschile.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.