Skip to main content

Security report for gph.lv

SIA GP HOLDING · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA GP HOLDING is a Latvian family-owned company specializing in road construction and related services, operating since 2013 with a legacy spanning three generations. The company offers a range of services including road and square construction, paving, earthworks, equipment rental, project management, and construction supervision primarily in the Baltic region. The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms in place, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy and security policies. Contact information is not explicitly provided on the homepage, which may impact user trust and compliance. Overall, the website presents a professional image consistent with a small-sized construction service provider in Latvia.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gph.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a specialized road construction service provider with a strong family business heritage and experienced staff trained under European standards. Its market focus is on municipalities and clients requiring road infrastructure services in the Baltics. The business model is service-oriented with additional equipment rental offerings. The website content and social media presence indicate moderate market engagement but lack detailed business transparency such as contact details and certifications. Growth indicators include project counts and years in operation, but no financial or partnership data is disclosed.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a cookie consent banner indicating GDPR awareness. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS, and no dedicated security or incident response policies are found. No contact channels for security incidents or data protection officers are provided. The absence of privacy and terms of service pages represents a compliance gap. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is basic and could be improved to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and transparency.
  2. Add security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information including phone numbers and emails for general and security-related inquiries.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing an incident response plan or security policy to demonstrate security maturity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA GP HOLDING
Description
Ceļu būves pakalpojumi. Ģimenes uzņēmums, dibināts 2013. gada 19. februārī, piedāvā dažādu veidu ceļu, laukumu, bruģēšanas, zemes būvniecības un rekonstrukcijas darbus, tehnikas nomu, projektu vadību un būvuzraudzību Baltijas teritorijā.
Key services
Road construction, Road repair and maintenance, Equipment rental, Project management, Construction supervision, Landscaping and greening
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Premium Addons for Elementor, jQuery, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress site using Elementor and Yoast SEO.
  2. Content is in Latvian with some Russian language support.
  3. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  4. Cookie consent banner present indicating GDPR awareness.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in content.
  7. Social media presence limited to Facebook page link.
  8. No security headers detected in HTML content.
  9. No forms detected on the homepage content provided.
  10. No evidence of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a standard CMS setup for small businesses. It uses Google Fonts and jQuery libraries, with minified CSS and JS for performance optimization. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate with caching plugins evident. Accessibility features are basic but present. No advanced hosting or CDN information is available from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small business website but could benefit from enhanced security and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gph.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gph.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.