Skip to main content

Security report for gpconsulting.lv

Golden Properties Consulting · Real Estate · Latvia

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Golden Properties Consulting is a Latvian real estate consulting company specializing in property sales, rentals, and management services. The company targets buyers, sellers, and investors within Latvia, offering a range of residential and commercial properties. Their website provides property listings, search functionality, and multiple contact forms to facilitate client engagement. The company maintains an active social media presence and provides clear contact information, enhancing customer accessibility. Technically, the website employs a modern tech stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA v3, and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized and features a cookie consent mechanism, indicating awareness of privacy compliance. However, no structured data or advanced SEO features were detected, and some accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and protects forms with reCAPTCHA, but lacks visible security headers such as CSP or HSTS. The absence of explicit security or incident response policies and missing WHOIS data limit the ability to fully assess domain legitimacy and security posture. Overall, the site demonstrates moderate security maturity with room for improvement. The overall risk is moderate; the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security headers, clearer compliance documentation, and verified domain registration data. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing detailed security and incident response policies, and ensuring WHOIS data availability to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gpconsulting.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
43
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Golden Properties Consulting operates as a small-sized real estate brokerage and consulting firm in Latvia, focusing on residential and commercial property markets. Their business model centers on online property listings and client lead generation through multiple contact forms and direct communication channels. The company leverages social media platforms to extend market reach and brand visibility. While the company appears locally focused, the lack of detailed business registration data and certifications suggests a modest market footprint. The website content and navigation are professionally designed, supporting customer engagement and trust. Growth opportunities may lie in expanding digital marketing, enhancing compliance transparency, and improving technical SEO to capture broader market segments.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is enforced, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 is implemented on all forms to mitigate spam and automated abuse. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks like clickjacking and protocol downgrade attacks. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact channels were found. The lack of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts domain legitimacy verification, which is a critical trust factor. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are evident, the site would benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and HSTS.
  2. Publish detailed security and incident response policies accessible from the website footer or dedicated pages.
  3. Ensure WHOIS data is accessible and up to date to improve domain trustworthiness and compliance.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by expanding cookie and data retention disclosures and appointing a Data Protection Officer if applicable.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities and improve performance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Golden Properties Consulting
Description
Real estate consulting and property sales/rent services in Latvia, offering listings for flats, houses, land, commercial properties, and investment opportunities.
Key services
Property sales, Property rentals, Property management, Consulting for buyers and sellers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Facebook Pixel, Slick Carousel, jQuery UI, Selectric
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust assessment.
  3. Website uses HTTPS and includes basic privacy and cookie policies.
  4. Multiple contact forms collect personal data with reCAPTCHA protection.
  5. Social media presence across Facebook, Instagram, VK, Twitter, LinkedIn.
  6. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found.
  7. No visible security headers detected in HTML content.
  8. Website content and navigation are professional and user-friendly.
  9. No structured data (JSON-LD) found in the HTML content.
  10. No explicit data protection officer or incident response contact found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery and jQuery UI for interactivity, and Selectric for enhanced select elements. Google reCAPTCHA v3 is integrated for form security, and Facebook Pixel along with Google Analytics are used for marketing and analytics. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets locally and asynchronously, supporting moderate performance. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive navigation and content layout. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident, and no structured data (JSON-LD) is present, limiting SEO potential. Accessibility features are basic, with some user-select disabling and minimal ARIA roles. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could be improved with modern SEO and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gpconsulting.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gpconsulting.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.