Skip to main content

Security report for gozochannel.com

Gozo Channel Ltd · Transportation · Malta

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gozo Channel Ltd operates as a vital ferry transportation service connecting the islands of Malta and Gozo. The company maintains a modern fleet of ferries and offers services including ticket sales, travel card schemes, and customer support. The website is designed to serve residents and visitors, providing essential travel information, live traffic cameras, and a mobile app for convenience. The business holds a strong market position as the primary ferry operator in the region. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frameworks such as Bootstrap 5 and uses multiple plugins for multilingual support, accessibility, and form management. Hosting is provided by Cloudways, and the site employs HTTPS with strong security headers, ensuring a secure browsing experience. Accessibility features and SEO optimizations are well implemented, contributing to a positive user experience. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices including HTTPS enforcement and security headers. However, it lacks a visible cookie consent mechanism and dedicated security or incident response policies, which are areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and functional with minor gaps in privacy compliance and security policy transparency. Strategic recommendations include implementing cookie consent, publishing security policies, and enhancing incident response readiness to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gozochannel.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
55
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Gozo Channel Ltd holds a strategic position in the Maltese transportation sector, providing essential ferry services between Malta and Gozo. The company targets both local residents and tourists, offering flexible travel options including foot passenger and vehicle transport. Revenue streams likely include ticket sales, travel card schemes, and possibly B2B partnerships. The website reflects a customer-centric approach with live updates, accessibility tools, and multilingual support. Partnerships with Visit Gozo and public transport services indicate a collaborative ecosystem. The business model is focused on reliable, scheduled ferry transport with added value through digital services such as a mobile app and online ticketing.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers in place. The use of reputable plugins and libraries reduces the risk of vulnerabilities. No exposed credentials or sensitive data were found. However, the absence of a published security policy and incident response contact channels limits transparency and preparedness. GDPR compliance is partially addressed through privacy policies but lacks explicit cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by formalizing security governance and user privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR cookie requirements.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy outlining security practices and incident response procedures.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance incident response readiness by providing clear security contact channels.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Gozo Channel Ltd
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gozo Channel Ltd
Description
Gozo Channel provides a vital “LIFE LINE” between the islands of Malta, the mainland, and Gozo. Its modern fleet includes three state of the art ferries, M.V. Ta’ Pinu, M.V. Gaudos and M.V. Malita. The company offers ferry services with onboard amenities such as free WIFI, refreshments, and temperature control. The website also promotes a mobile app available on Google Play and App Store.
Key services
Ferry transport between Malta and Gozo, Ticket sales and travel card schemes, Customer feedback and support, Dangerous goods transport service
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5, jQuery, FontAwesome, Moment.js, Moment Timezone, WordPress, Formidable Forms plugin, WPML (multilingual plugin), Popup Maker plugin, Pojo Accessibility plugin, Breeze caching plugin, HTML5 QR Code library
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is well-structured and relevant to the ferry transportation sector.
  3. Multiple accessibility features are implemented including an accessibility toolbar.
  4. Social media presence is active with official Facebook and YouTube channels.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published on the site.
  6. Privacy and terms policies are linked to official government pages, enhancing trust.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected in scripts or external links.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a robust WordPress platform with modern front-end technologies including Bootstrap 5 and jQuery. It leverages multiple plugins for multilingual support (WPML), accessibility (Pojo Accessibility), form management (Formidable Forms), and caching (Breeze). The site is hosted on Cloudways, indicating a managed cloud hosting environment. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD. Technical risks are minimal but depend on maintaining plugin updates and monitoring third-party scripts.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gozochannel.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gozochannel.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.