Skip to main content

Security report for gopunica.com

Uskur · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website gopunica.com represents Uskur, a small technology company founded in 2020 that offers an integrated association and events management software solution. The platform targets associations and event organizers, providing a comprehensive SaaS product that includes features such as membership management, event management, abstract submissions, virtual events, and integrations like Moodle. The website content is professional and well-structured, with a clear focus on its niche market. Technically, the site employs a modern front-end stack including Bootstrap and various JavaScript libraries, hosted on Linode servers. Performance and mobile optimization are moderate to good, though accessibility and SEO could be improved. Security posture is moderate; the domain is registered with a reputable registrar and has clientTransferProhibited status, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is weak, with no visible privacy or cookie policies and no GDPR indicators. Contact information is limited to a contact form, with no direct emails or phone numbers provided. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gopunica.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Uskur operates in the technology sector, focusing on software solutions for associations and event management. Their business model is SaaS-based, targeting a niche market of associations and event organizers. The company appears to be small-sized with a focused product offering. The website highlights key services and add-ons, indicating a modular approach to their software. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content. The lack of direct contact details and privacy policies suggests room for improvement in customer trust and compliance. The company’s market position is that of a specialized provider with a professional online presence but limited transparency in compliance and security disclosures.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate. The domain is registered with a reputable registrar and has clientTransferProhibited status, which helps prevent unauthorized transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing attacks. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. The site uses HTTPS (implied by external Google Analytics scripts loaded over HTTPS), but SSL configuration details are not provided. There are no visible privacy or cookie policies, which is a compliance gap especially under GDPR. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are absent. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are evident, the site would benefit from implementing security best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility and SEO features to improve user experience and search engine visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Uskur
Description
Integrated association and events management application. The only software you'll need to run your association and events.
Key services
Association Management, Memberships, Event Management, Abstract Submission & Scoring, Website & Knowledge Management, Virtual Events, Networking, Moodle Integration, Open Access Publishing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Popper.js, Bootstrap, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Fancybox, Flatpickr, Flickity, Ion RangeSlider, Isotope, Jarallax, jQuery Countdown, jQuery SmartWizard, Plyr, Prism, ScrollMonitor, Smooth Scroll, SVGInjector, TwitterFetcher
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  2. Contact information is only available via a contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  3. Website uses modern front-end technologies and multiple JavaScript libraries.
  4. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  5. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) found in the HTML content.
  6. No social media links or company emails explicitly listed.
  7. Website content is professional and focused on association and event management software.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. Domain registration is consistent and appropriate for the business.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design and a variety of JavaScript libraries for UI enhancements and analytics. Hosting is provided by Linode, a reputable VPS provider. The site loads multiple external scripts for analytics and UI features, which may impact performance but also provide rich functionality. The HTML content is well-structured with meta viewport tags and responsive images. However, no CMS or backend technology is explicitly detected. SEO metadata is minimal with empty description and keywords meta tags. Accessibility features are basic, with some ARIA attributes and semantic HTML but no advanced accessibility aids. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could be improved with better SEO, accessibility, and security header configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gopunica.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gopunica.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.